11 months
You must log in or register to comment.
- 11 months
Jesus fuck. As someone who works in biotech: this is probably going to kill people.
- UsoSaito@feddit.ukEnglish11 months
Like why don’t we just have ACTUAL DOCTORS and techs trained to do this actually test it. Wild concept I know.
- 11 months
It’s ok they’re replacing the doctors with LLMs now it’ll be fine I promise
- boomzilla@programming.devEnglish11 months
Yesterday on reddit I saw a photo a patient shot over the shoulder of his doctor of his computer monitor. It had ChadGPT full with diagnosis requests.
https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1keqstk/doctor_using_chatgpt_for_a_visit_due_to_knife_cut/
- floofloof@lemmy.caEnglish11 months
Doctors cost money and the money goes to doctors. LLMs cost less and the money goes to billionaire fascist techbros. The fact that they’re not fit for purpose is insignificant compared to the potential for techbro enrichment.
Also, doctors have an annoying habit of helping people to live regardless of whether techbro eugenics says they deserve to.
- TexMexBazooka@lemm.eeEnglish11 months
Because it costs money to educate the doctors, then they want money.
- givesomefucks@lemmy.worldEnglish11 months
Ignorance is bliss homie…
https://afresearchlab.com/news/department-of-the-air-force-launches-niprgpt/
People really don’t want to know how much AI is being shoved down the government’s and military’s throats these days.
It ain’t even just a musk/trump thing, most of it was put in motion under Biden, but now idiots are running with it.
Like, who the fuck really wants the space force using a closeted version of the same consumer level chatbot coding shit?
Fucking no one who understands anything about any of this, but the people calling the shots believe the hype.
So ignorance is bliss.
- bobs_monkey@lemm.eeEnglish11 months
They don’t care though, if anything it’s more money for the medical profit machine.
- Womble@lemmy.worldEnglish11 months
He could see AI being used more immediately to address certain “low-hanging fruit,” such as checking for application completeness. “Something as trivial as that could expedite the return of feedback to the submitters based on things that need to be addressed to make the application complete,” he says. More sophisticated uses would need to be developed, tested, and proved out.
Oh no, the dystopian horror…
- ZILtoid1991@lemmy.worldEnglish11 months
LLMs also do a lot of mistakes even when used for text analysis, and as the tech sector loves the “move fast and break things” mantra, it’ll be put into practice much earlier than it should be.
- 11 months
If it’s trained carefully, professionally, responsibly, with bonafide medical research data exclusively, I can see it being a boon to healthcare professionals. I just don’t know if I can trust that will happen in the timeline we live in.
11 monthsOpen evidence is a legit tool my colleagues and classmates use every day. Open AI is leagues behind them especially in terms of HIPAA compliance.
damn i see that chatbots don’t want to stay behind rfk jr in body count
will they learn that safety regulations are written in blood? who am i kidding, that’s not their blood
- NarrativeBear@lemmy.worldEnglish11 months
Most PCs no longer have floppy disk readers or CD drives, where are they going to put the placebo or drugs in. /s
