View all comments ➔
  • 10 months

    They feel they suffered “direct and concrete” damage from the way Teslas are now associated with “Elon Musk’s actions”, the GKA law firm said.

    They are demanding the Paris commercial court order their lease contracts be terminated and legal costs reimbursed, it said in a statement

    As funny as this is I can’t see it going anywhere.

    • 10 months

      Maybe not, but there’s some merit to it. Initially it was a highly desirable car, now one is ashamed to be in because owner is a Nazi. Another problem is that there’s much higher risk that someone else will damage it (again, because of the owner).

      • 10 months

        Also: this was not accidental but a willful decision made by the company. If they did just Boeing it you would not have a case.

      • 10 months

        That should increase the insurance premium and therefore the lease as well due to the risk

      • 10 months

        Ya, I’m guessing insurance costs have risen and that definitely comes into play.

      • 10 months

        There’s absolutely merit to the idea, but probably not merit legally. But who knows, legalities are labyrinthine and stupid and vary from country to country.

    • 10 months

      Why? This was not something people must have expected due to it being obvious and there is also plain and obvious harm done to them.

      • 10 months

        If this is the precedent then everything becomes unexpected. You made a contract buying the car, that contract is signed in the past. Nobody cares what happens after that.

        • 10 months

          I think they are looking for an early release from the lease, not a refund on a purchase.

        • Let’s not forget how much scummy stuff Elon is doing. It’s not “only” the whole Nazi thing (which btw totally increased the chance of the car being vandalized). We know that he lied about the autopilot, which totally is something to sue about and give back a leased car.