• asudox@lemmy.world
        2 years

        Welp, I haven’t seen anyone learn Swift other than for Apple stuff these days. So I wonder how many can actually contribute to the code. It’s also made by Apple, so yeah. It would have been more performant and secure (both of which are pretty important in a browser) if it was written in a more low level language. For example Rust.

      • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
        2 years

        Shopify (i.e. Shittify) being their top donor already has me looking sideways at this project. They’ll invest in anything they think they can get an edge with and if something starts to happen they’ll fuck it up and wallstreet-ify it as fast as possible if they can.

        Their (Shopify’s) guru founder Tobi made a huge NFT play that went absolutely nowhere while I still worked there. They spent a lot of time and money on it, right before they laid several thousand people off.

        • SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works
          2 years

          While I agree shopify has a kind of “mierda touch”, I still see it as if it goes sideways with them someone will just fork the code.

          • TerkErJerbs@lemm.ee
            2 years

            I mean I hope Ladybird devs do a great build and go their own way without being corrupted by their donors and all that, don’t get me wrong. But whenever I see that dumb shopping bag logo I get the no feelings.

            You can also read up on how the vast majority of Mozilla’s funding has been coming from Google for a very long time, and draw your own conclusions from that fact.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          2 years

          I agree that it’s not ideal, but hey, it’s open source, and the Louis Rossmann cult is the only other top-tier donor, so I’m sure they’ll be fine.

        • x00z@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2 years

          Do you have a source for that? I’m trying to look for donors but don’t really find anything.

  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    2 years

    Sounds fun, but I wish there were more people who’d invest in making Firefox’s Gecko more easy to use (stretch goal: revive Proton, which is Electron but Firefox) instead of pushing a ton of effort into inventing a new thing.

    That said, this is coming from SerenityOS (specifically, the founder and basically the entire community concentrating on building its browser instead of hacking the OS, resulting in a split), so I understand that it might be a lot harder to port large codebases to a new OS instead of than starting a new one.

    Edit: It’s Positron, not Proton

  • slacktoid@lemmy.mlEnglish
    2 years

    Hot take: Since it’s a BSD licensed browser at some point in the future, there’s going to be a company that funds it brings it to mainstream with their flavor, and then will over throw chromium in time. Replace an ‘evil’ with another ‘evil’.

    • sorrybookbroke@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      2 years

      All hail the cuck license, ensuring we end up back at the same place every single time.

      Good intentions and all that

      • slacktoid@lemmy.mlEnglish
        2 years

        Isn’t that the road to hell? Paved with good intentions

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      2 years

      I like this project and just hope it was gplv3 or some similar copyleft license

      • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
        2 years

        Ladybird is licences under BSD-clause 2. Which allows privatization of the code.

        IMO a web browser should be GPLv3, specially to not allow DRM bullshit in the browser.

          • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
            2 years

            Yeah AGPLv3 is the best if it’s going to be hosted as a service. Which a lot of web services do. Good point.

            • Amju Wolf@pawb.socialEnglish
              2 years

              …to be fair browsers don’t really make sense for streaming, but you could call it “future proofing”.

    • mariusafa@lemmy.sdf.org
      2 years

      Yeah not a good licence at all for an independent browser. Idk if Servo MPL is a good license either. Do you know of any web browser that is GPL?

      • slacktoid@lemmy.mlEnglish
        2 years

        Its better than a BSD style license which is what I was mainly critiquing

      • astro_ray@piefed.socialEnglish
        2 years

        Definitely not what you want, but Gnome web (Epiphany) is GPLv3 according to flathub.