Even if we take into consideration that 90% (out of 25) could be lying (they aren’t), that’s still ~3 women he assaulted.
Edit: Damn y’all, thanks for that old internet feeling I keep coming back to Lemmy for. Not a girl in sight in these comments.
Is testifying under oath not considered evidence? There have been so many credible lawsuits against this guy for sexual assault. Honestly what are these files going to prove that we don’t already have plenty of evidence for?
And lastly, do you have any idea what going after a rich powerful man for sexually assaulting you does to your life? Why the fuck would anybody put themselves through that if they weren’t absolutely sure they had a credible case? Some of the plaintiffs in these cases had their lives and their family’s lives threatened and disrupted.
Welp, to the bottom with me I suppose.
Yep, plus he’s openly misogynistic. He’s not a man that treats women with respect, and objectifies many. Then there’s his red flag relationship with his daughter…
You don’t trust the guy that made a promise to his 17 year old daughter that he’d never date younger than her?
And not only make that promise but went on Howard Stern and openly told the world about it?
It’s bizarre. Like just that one comment is enough to make me not want to stand up for the guy.
Yep!! Why would anyone have to promise not to abuse underage/barely of age women? “I promise I won’t molest kids” should ALWAYS be unnecessary