Last week, Marathon Fusion, a San Francisco-based energy startup, submitted a preprint detailing an action plan for synthesizing gold particles via nuclear transmutation—essentially the process of turning one element into another by tweaking its nucleus. The paper, which has yet to undergo peer review, argues that the proposed system would offer a new revenue stream from all the new gold being produced, in addition to other economic and technological benefits.

  • Atropos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    “But it’s worth noting that the same process would likely result in the production of unstable and potentially radioactive isotopes of gold. As such, Rutkowski admitted, the gold would have to be stored for 14 to 18 years before it could be labeled radiation-safe.”

    Ah yes, 18-year vintage, very nice choice. Pairs well with a 3 carat lab grown diamond!

    • ch00f@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is like a reverse Goldfinger plan. Could have an interesting impact on the gold market if it can be done at scale.

      I’m sure most gold mining operations take at least a few years to get permitted and started and then there’s risk that you won’t find as much gold as expected.

      Compared to a lump of gold that all you have to do is not lose it and it will appreciate in value all on its own.

  • NoWay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    In theory but can they do it efficiently. Probably not. And definitely not yet. But hey let them get the fool’s money.

  • Gladaed@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is stupid, but not for the reasons you would think.

    The energy required to change lead into gold is bigger than their difference in price.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The whole point of the paper is that limitation has been breached. The fusion plant would primarily create electricity, and gold is a profitable byproduct.

      It’s not out of peer review, though.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 months ago

      LoL, why else would they be publishing a paper on the process rather than buying an absolute ton of mercury and manufacturing gold like mad?

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Because they have to build a full scale reactor first. That’s expensive.

        The way this usually works is that you do the research, get a patent on it, license that out, and then capitalists pretend they invented the whole thing themselves and deserve all the profits.

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why do we try to turn things into gold? The price of gold would collapse if we succeeded, so wouldn’t it be completely pointless?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      If you have a monopoly on the process, then its the same as the DeBeers Diamond Cartel. You can keep the price up by limiting the sale and spending a ton of money on marketing.