What if the fundamental nature of reality is a timeless ocean where every possible bundle of qualia - first person sensory experiences - exists within it? Time doesn’t actually exist, but the illusion of it could, as bundles could have false memories and expectations.
You must log in or register to comment.
- slazer2au@lemmy.worldEnglish5 months
I don’t know what you are on, but did you bring enough for everyone else?
- slazer2au@lemmy.worldEnglish5 months
By holding it below the shower. But I don’t know if that is just an Aussie thing with how our water works
- 5 months
…nature of reality is a timeless ocean where every possible bundle of qualia - first person sensory experiences - exists within it? Time doesn’t actually exist, but the illusion of it could…
Isn’t that an oxymoron? If every possible first-person sensory experience exists, then time exists (we experience time).
- TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish5 months
The experience of time would exist, but each individual moment would in reality be timeless - just with a false experience of time for some of them.
- 5 months
I guess if that was the fundamental nature of reality, then stuff would be exactly as it is.
- 5 months
There’s a possibility, but I don’t see any practical implications.
Also, what strand?
- TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish5 months
Can you expand on what you mean by that? As I thought, the scientific method was about empirically testing things, and the empirical world is defined by what we can sense - ie our qualia.
- 5 months
My understanding is that qualia are how a “consciousness” experiences something, and I disagree with the notion of a consciousness being a definable thing in general. It’s not a scientific meaning so you can never unambiguously talk about anything in the context of qualia.
