View all comments ➔
  • 4 months

    Is anyone really surprised one of the biggest companies in occupied korea would do this??

      • Yeah, that’s a “block and move on with your day” sort of account for sure.

      • 4 months

        Yes, the premier communist instance, what’s yer problem with it?

        • 4 months

          Please fill in the blanks:

          • China’s socioeconomic model is _____.
          • In the Russia—Ukraine war, Russia is _____.
          • _____ Korea is the more prosperous of the two.
          • 4 months

            “More prosperous” means absolutely nothing historically or ethically, or worse it typically means “aligned with imperialist hegemons”.

            • I appreciate your honesty in admitting that you consider human well-being to be irrelevant!

              • 4 months

                What a pointlessly hostile and asshole way to make your point! Did it feel good? I’ll try to refrain from doing the same.

                What “prosperity” means in this context is typically just amassed wealth and GDP, which says nothing about how well the population is actually doing.

                • Under which definition of prosperity (whether that being the well-being of the population or “alignment with imperial powers”) is North Korea doing better?

                  You made it sound like the answer depends on the definition of “prosperity” so I’m wondering under which definition the answer would be different.

                  • 4 months

                    I said literally: it means absolutely nothing historically or ethically, or worse it typically means “aligned with imperialist hegemons”.

                    Do I need to explain to you what that means, or do you have a clue about South Korean history and US foreign policy?

          • I have seen people from .ml defending N. Korea while saying S. Korea are the bad guys. They think the state of affairs in N. Korea is just western propaganda and it’s actually a communist utopia there. Some seem really unhinged with their theories.