Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldbyFleur_@aussie.zone2 monthsYou always have to analyse a person's internet post about themselves or their life the same way you read a book written with an unreliable narrator 29144147
agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works2 monthsThat’s the entire point of citation, repeatable experiment, and peer review. The only way we can ever touch at reliability is cross-referential consensus. 2
TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish2 monthsOf course, consensus doesn’t automatically mean truth if the consensers aren’t all being self interrogative and critically thinking. 1
That’s the entire point of citation, repeatable experiment, and peer review. The only way we can ever touch at reliability is cross-referential consensus.
Of course, consensus doesn’t automatically mean truth if the consensers aren’t all being self interrogative and critically thinking.
Certainly, but it’s the only real starting place