• From what I read it’s mostly bot created nonsense stub articles. I’d rather have a smaller wiki with higher quality than a pond that’s miles wide but only inches deep.

    • 3 months

      They aren’t nonsense articles. Those bots create articles about any known species. They usually only include the name, taxonomy, who described it first, and sometimes a description.

  • 3 months

    never knew wikipedia accepts bot generated text… what’s the point of doing that?

    • I don’t think it’s a matter of “accepting” but rather it being mostly community maintained, and so languages with minimal communities get no moderation.

    • To clarify, Lsjbot is/was a deterministic bot that would create stub articles about subjects functionally guaranteed to be notable (by whatever ceb.wiki’s standards are, which I think mirror ours on en.wiki). It would add basic information in a template format.

      E.g. “Pissus shitticus is an X in the family Y. It was described in 1234 by Some Fucking Guy.”

      The upside to this is that one of the hardest parts of making a good article is just having the article in the first place. Labor-wise it’s not difficult, but it’s a psychological thing.

      The downside is that, unlike on en.wiki which already has its hands full with a couple million bot-created articles, ceb.wiki could not possibly ever hope to substantially complete 99% of these. So they’ll be stuck as shitty stubs that are little more than a verbose database entry for eternity.

  • 3 months

    The suspense is killing me, which language is number one?