I can see some merit in this idea. On a similar note, my company has GH Copilot code reviews, so I regularly generate code with Copilot using the Claude Sonnet model locally and then Copilot reviews my PRs (in addition to humans). A lot of times, the code review feedback is on point, and then I often copy and paste it back to the Copilot agent I’m running locally to address the code review feedback.

Having 2 passes of AI does improve the result, though it would quickly go off the rails without senior engineers reviewing and steering the output, not to mention putting the initial architecture in place. From my experience, I can’t imagine building anything with AI that has any reasonable amount of complexity that won’t eventually collapse in on itself without the guidance of senior engineers. Multiple AI agents working as an ensemble won’t eliminate the need for that guidance, IMO.

I self-host Forgejo and use its issues for this purpose, though it’s probably too simplistic based on your description.

The Elder Scrolls VI with mandatory Copilot integration 💀

BitLocker? More like ShitLocker.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

From a quick reading of the actual law, here are some of the AI uses it prohibits that will apparently “stifle innovation”:

…use of an AI system that exploits any of the vulnerabilities of a natural person or a specific group of persons due to their age, disability or a specific social or economic situation

…to assess or predict the risk of a natural person committing a criminal offence, based solely on the profiling of a natural person or on assessing their personality traits and characteristics

…the use of an AI system that deploys subliminal techniques beyond a person’s consciousness or purposefully manipulative or deceptive techniques

…the use of AI systems that create or expand facial recognition databases through the untargeted scraping of facial images from the internet or CCTV footage

…the use of biometric categorisation systems that categorise individually natural persons based on their biometric data to deduce or infer their race, political opinions, trade union membership, religious or philosophical beliefs, sex life or sexual orientation

The CEOs are investing in AI to put on airs for investors and inflate their company valuation, often pissing off customers and losing sales in the process. It’s evidently a worthy trade-off to make number go up.

I first read it as TLC. You mean the TVs will play nothing but low-grade reality shows?

Whining that nobody wants to use your product worked pretty well for Zuck and his Mii-verse. Oh, that’s right, it didn’t, never mind.

Yeah, people responding to my original comment assume I’d prefer Jim Crow Joe. Trump has a more abrasive personality that a lot of people love to hate, but obviously they’re both geriatric puppets to distract everyone while the billionaire cabal continues business as usual. Trump is primarily an entertainer and is certainly the more engaging distraction.

I assume you’re referring to the fact that Tesla has a Shanghai factory and is exporting Teslas made there to Canada.

Yeah, I liked Jim Crow Joe even less than orange gameshow host. Some of his policies had direct negative effects on my life. Then the election came around and the democrats decided we don’t get a primary at all this time, so we ended up with a choice between an ignorant gameshow host who somehow fancies himself an independent thinker and a cackling hen who puts on no such airs, both of whom are completely loyal to the international billionaire cabal.

I’d sooner buy a Chinese EV than a Tesla, but the orange gameshow host running my country says I can’t.

At least in Star Trek, the robots would say things like, “I am not programmed to respond in that area.” LLMs will just make shit up, which should really be the highest priority issue to fix if people are going to be expected to use them.

Using coding agents, it is profoundly annoying when they generate code against an imaginary API, only to tell me that I’m “absolutely right to question this” when I ask for a link to the docs. I also generally find AI search to be useless, even though DuckDuckGo as an example does link to sources, but said sources often have no trace of the information presented in the summary.

Until LLMs can directly cite and include a link to a credible source for every piece of information they present, they’re just not reliable enough to depend on for anything important. Even with sources linked, it would also need to be able to rate and disclose the credibility of every source (e.g., is the study peer reviewed and reproduced, is the sample size adequate, etc.).

I certainly wouldn’t let something like a cheap RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server with 96GB of VRAM go to waste. I’d put it to good use with Blender rendering, running models I actually care about, and maybe some Games on Whales.

I have multiple Reolink cameras and can recommend them. Everything can run completely locally with their app and the cameras blocked in the firewall while recording to a SD card. You can let the cameras connect to their servers for push notifications and remote access if you like (I unblock them in the firewall sometimes if I’m going to be away and want to access them).

The cameras have onboard ML that can detect humans, cars, pets, and motion, and it’s fully possible to leverage those events in HA, making a something like Frigate and a Coral TPU unnecessary.

Personally, I just use them with the app, as well as RTSP streams from VLC, though I did have local push notifications setup with HA in the past for human detection from my Reolink doorbell.

Yeah, as does Reaper, though I really want a modern version of Cubase to work.

Nice, do DAWs next! 😍