Dane here. I don’t know what Peter Hummelgaard’s major malfunction is, but at this point I’d like to see his personal finances audited by the PET to ensure that he’s not subject to any undue outside influence.
Maybe throw in a psychiatric evaluation too, because having a multi-year erection over violating other people’s privacy can’t be fucking normal.
“We also plan on patenting atmospheric air and granting reasonably priced usage licenses for limited daily volumes to every man, woman and child on the planet. It’ll be great!”
Nah. They’ll all be needed to clean up the inevitable mess.
“Tact? Wazzat? Can I eat it?”
“No, it’s a principle of applying delicacy in human interactions to spare-”
“You just said I cannot eat it, and now you’re saying it’s a delicacy!”
Sighs.
Much like Vampires, no sane person should ever invite Oracle into their home: Both are bloodsucking parasitical leeches, and you’ll never be rid of the affliction.
Huh. I don’t see any investment in “Crisis Actor Hiring Services Ltd.”
Must be paying people with his dividends. /s
“We… We don’t talk about it.”
Yes of course, that’s why I said it was important. But this table is about gender disparities in specific reasons for admittance. If the ratio can’t possibly be anything but 100%, what does that tell me about anything other than the self-evidently obvious?
You might as well tell me water is wet or the sky blue. Very true and both those facts are important, but neither is exactly new or surprising information.
Yes, yes. Entirely legitimate issues about gender identity aside, I think we all know my point here is strictly about biology.
On the one hand, all the pregnancy-related items are of course very important – but they’re not particularly illuminating on a list like this. If there was a “Testicular Torsion” item marked as 100% male, that wouldn’t really tell me much here either.
No one has ever accused me of being over-burdened by excess sanity, but even I can see the wisdom of this prohibition.
Besides, I don’t owe those assholes any of my shrooms!
Given that data brokers are the substrate of a vast privatized mass-surveillance network, by any reasonable metric they’re all unsanctioned out-of-control spies as it is regardless of who they then other people’s personal information sell to.
That would be the point at which things - expensive, crucial things - would start catching on fire for reasons that has nothing to do with anything I might be doing.
And who doesn’t enjoy using 90% of their system resources to compile the 10% remainder all the time?
Likely yes, though it won’t matter to me. I’ll recompile from suitably modified source code if it comes to that.
Very interesting, although I’m going to withhold judgment pending some serious peer review.
Edit: One person doesn’t like peer review to be part of the scientific process.
“The only reason I’m not choking all you apes out is because my paws lack opposable thumbs.”
The weak-willed see a deterrent, while the enterprising see a guaranteed way to get rid of the lock.
At least it wasn’t a string of drool paired with a dopey smile.