a lot of improvements in security, libs, abi, …

    • solardirus@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      A really shitty one. (As in, completely removes Xwayland, and results in obvious regressions.)

    • chimay@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      yes, apparently the development of Xorg is more or less abandoned in favor of wayland

      the Xlibre fork seems more active

    • Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah very recently, by a guy who says it is explicitly anti “DEI” in the readme and thinks there is some kind of conspirancy by IBM to kill Xorg

      • Leny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Just quoting the readme so there’s no misinterpretation:

        This is an independent project, not at all affiliated with BigTech or any of their subsidiaries or tax evasion tools, nor any political activists groups, state actors, etc. It’s explicitly free of any “DEI” or similar discriminatory policies. Anybody who’s treating others nicely is welcomed. It doesn’t matter which country you’re coming from, your political views, your race, your sex, your age, your food menu, whether you wear boots or heels, whether you’re furry or fairy, Conan or McKay, comic character, a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri, or just a boring average person. Anybody who’s interested in bringing X forward is welcome.

          • chimay@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            So, you comdemn all the project because its founder just happened to have an opinion you don’t like about a topic completely disconnected from the software world ?

            • Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              The anti DEI stuff is in the project readme and the anti vax bullshit was on the lkml. So I think the auther can not keep his ‘opinions’ and politics out of his projects. If he uses his software work to promote potentially dangerous believes, I don’t think the project should be supported or promoted

                • Kwdg@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  His opinion is literally on the frontpage of his project on github, there is nothing ‘alleged’ about it. I don’t think the project can be separated from his opinions