• network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    It’s always been delusional to think organizations run by public people based in any country wouldn’t abide by laws and government orders. They can hop countries and this will always happen. There is not a single jurisdiction in the world where any company will legally be safe from censorship, government coercion. Tech has to be designed and adopted for its resilience to state coercion and risk for loss in leadership

  • Cris@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Yeah as much as I don’t love proton as a company this feels wildly misleading…

  • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    22 days ago

    Why repost this with the sensationalist headline but not include the context provided in the comments by @[email protected]

    "The author omitted the complete statement from Reddit:

    Hi everyone,

    No, Proton did not knowingly block journalists’ email accounts. Our support for journalists and those working in the public interest has been demonstrated time and again through actions, not just words.

    In this case, we were alerted by a CERT that certain accounts were being misused by hackers in violation of Proton’s Terms of Service. This led to a cluster of accounts being disabled.

    Because of our zero-access architecture, we cannot see the content of accounts and therefore cannot always know when anti-abuse measures may inadvertently affect legitimate activism.

    Our team has reviewed these cases individually to determine if any can be restored. We have now reinstated 2 accounts, but there are other accounts we cannot reinstate due to clear ToS violations.

    Regarding Phrack’s claim on contacting our legal team 8 times: this is not true. We have only received two emails to our legal team inbox, last one on Sep 6 with a 48-hour deadline. This is unrealistic for a company the size of Proton, especially since the message was sent to our legal team inbox on a Saturday, rather than through the proper customer support channels.

    The situation has unfortunately been blown out of proportion without giving us a fair chance to respond to the initial outreach."

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      So, in summary, Proton will block any account, without any evidence, just because a random CERT says so.

      • _cryptagion [he/him]@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 days ago

        if a CERT came to whatever email provider you use and accused you of being a malicious hacker, your email service would absolutely terminate your account.