Technology@lemmy.worldbyfubarx@lemmy.world2 monthsArs Technica Fires Reporter After AI Controversy Involving Fabricated Quotesfuturism.com English 106563569
resipsaloquitur@lemmy.worldBannedEnglish2 monthsOr, you know, double-check that the quotes given to you by the experimental AI “quote extractor” tool are accurate? He is (was) their go-to AI reporter. It’s not like they handed the assignment to an intern and said “go nuts.” And the article was about AI fabricating an attack on a developer that rejected its PR. 7
ThomasWilliams@lemmy.worldEnglish2 monthsThe whole point of using AI is that its a search tool and that is the verification. Otherwise there’s no point in using it. And you can guarantee Conde Nast demands journalists use AI all the time. 050%1
Or, you know, double-check that the quotes given to you by the experimental AI “quote extractor” tool are accurate?
He is (was) their go-to AI reporter. It’s not like they handed the assignment to an intern and said “go nuts.”
And the article was about AI fabricating an attack on a developer that rejected its PR.
The whole point of using AI is that its a search tool and that is the verification.
Otherwise there’s no point in using it.
And you can guarantee Conde Nast demands journalists use AI all the time.