I’ve taken it too far haven’t I?
I like the little Ferris!
Eh, I don’t get it at all so I can’t judge. I feel like even a 104 key-layout is kinda lacking, a keyboad just doesn’t seem like the right place for minimalism to me.
I wish I could join the under-20-keys gang. What are you running with tho? KMK?
So one half is for typing in t9, what does the other half do ?
Layers, so many layers.
So one button is for key, all other are layers?
Not sure if this is bragging or a call for help
What do you plan to do with the extra 17 switches that aren’t necessary for morse code?
To be fair I am planning on putting them back at some point.
I’m working on a core 18-key layout that I can expand anywhere up to 34 keys, so I have a consistent layout that I can use on some of the unibody split keyboards that are usually in that range of keys.
Bit too low for me but interesting. I think ditching pinky column completely is too much, I’d rather go 3*4+2 per hand minimum.
What’s the layout?
It’s my own layout starting from Colemak DH with the “missing” outer keys on another layer.
Yeah I’m doing it to establish a common layout for my symbol / number / navigation layers more than anything else, so I can expand from there to some 28 and 30 key keyboards as well as the Ferris Sweep with some consistant muscle memory.
@hannadryad Yes.
