• Really, how is that possible? The company making absolutely ridiculous claims that are in no way possible and are instantly a red flag for anyone whos ever touched tech with a 20 foot pole instantly sees is lying about there mystical miracle tech?

    • The problem is there are multiple tech companies involved, all bullshitting each other. It starts with a German screening technology company claiming they can screen produce the solid state electrode, when they never made a single battery ever. if company A can develop the tech then company B can assemble the battery to do into the motorcycles in company C.

      Formula E racing uses the state of the art in batteries, and for 2027 they sourced a lithium battery even though cost was no object.

      Two Chinese companies claim to be making solid state batteries, put the performance is only equal to classic lithium.

      Toyota got burned on this. They were promised SS batteries delivered by 2025. Never happened.

      • 55 minutes

        Aaw crap, if that ever happened to me it would really bum me out if I had good intentions.

      • I thought I read Toyota was building their own ginormous SS battery factory several years ago.

      • 1 hour

        Just fyi, you can make a solid state lithium battery. It’s just the only benefit for it is less weight for the same space rather than increased energy density.

  • 8 hours

    Industry experts who met with CT Coatings representatives doubted their technical skills. Julian Zanau from the Fraunhofer Research Institute recalled concerns following discussions with company officials.

    “The first impression I got was that these people have no idea how a battery actually works. They were talking about no rare earth metals in their batteries and therefore no lithium, and to any chemist lithium has nothing to do with rare earth minerals.”

    🔥

    • 7 hours

      The running theory I had seen was that they were licensing out someone else’s tech, and then claiming it as their own.

      And now this article shows that to be more true than I had thought.

      Meanwhile, there’s a company out of Taiwan doing this, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQFVIs4leig

      The guy cuts a cell in half with a pair of scissors, and as soon as the scissors are pulled away the little LED light comes back on.

        • 5 hours

          Same company, their newest cells are based on that tech, but with 7 years of advances, so 360Wh/kg. Which is about the same as most other top end Lithium-ion batteries, just solid-state rather than a liquid electrolyte.

      • 6 hours

        That’s actually super cool, and more in line with what one might expect from the gradual progression of solid state energy storage.

        (Also, I’m a layperson, so my expectations should be taken as such.)

        • YouTube is a platform for millions of accounts, it’s not a monolith of uniform quality.

          Two-Bit DaVinci is respected and credible.

  • Wild. Did they really think they could just hype this up and release something like this and not get found out?

    • Reading the article, the investigation isn’t a case of independent labs getting hold of the battery and definitively disproving Donut’s claims. It’s battery experts and researchers looking at the data Donut has released and saying, “these claims are extraordinary and the evidence doesn’t yet convince us. Here’s what we think the battery actually is.” That’s a very reasonable scientific position, especially when you’re talking about 400 Wh/kg, 5-minute charging, and 100,000 cycles all at once.

      But without independently tested samples, there are still a lot of unknowns and inferences involved. That’s not to say the skeptics are wrong, but it’s still arguably a case of skeptics being skeptical… reasonably so, but based on analysis of the available evidence rather than direct examination of the battery itself.

      • This seems to be a smoking gun:

        Researchers say the most convincing evidence came from measuring how the cell expanded during charging.

        When a battery charges, ions move into the anode, causing it to expand. Graphite anodes have a unique expansion pattern because of changes in graphite’s layered structure. The Donut Lab cell showed this exact pattern.

        This finding matters because sodium ions are too big to fit into graphite the way lithium ions do. According to investigators, the graphite expansion pattern clearly shows that lithium is the active ion in the battery.

      • Except they’ve misled investors, and that will get them into deep shit.

        Because fuck consumers

        Mislead consumers, FTC sleeps

        Mislead investors…

        • 50 minutes

          You only get in trouble if you mislead rich investors.

          If you mislead poor investors, then that’s just business and they should have known better.

        • 4 hours

          What FTC lmao, they’re a Finnish company registered in Estonia. Billionaires don’t get fast tracked court cases here. They’ll move to some other country long before anything happens.

          • 3 hours

            Wouldn’t those countries have more strict regulations than the US? Maybe Finland more than Estonia?

            • 1 hour

              Courts move at snails pace usually. Years for such a thing in Estonia at least. Have to prove fraud and all that.

              For debts it’s possible to accelerate things, but the key here is that Donut Labs is the debtor, not Mark. He himself will only be liable when fraud is proven.

          • My mistake. I forgot other countries exist.

            But yeah I dropped that key point I guess between finishing the article and commenting.

        • Ftfy

          Because fuck consumers

          Mislead consumers, FTC sleeps

          Mislead investors…

          Also they just need to make a little donation and I’m sure they will be pardoned.

          • 4 hours

            Pardoned by whom? We don’t have presidential pardons in the countries they’re operating out of.

    • 5 hours

      Investors are stupid enough if only everyone else didn’t tell them to be so dumb about this

    • 6 hours

      I mean these days with all the hyped up scams all over social media including Lemmy… yeah?

    • That wouldn’t be unprecedented behavior in the battery industry. The mark ups on batteries can be huge and if they fail, unless the battery explodes, most people will just buy a new one. It’s difficult for one customer to see the difference between a defective battery and a battery that failed sooner than expected. It is the kind of industry that attracts con artists.

    • I would be disappointed, but random news about sodium ion batteries keeps popping up and making me think it’s not so bad after all.

      The there was that one article that was way too sensational to be anywhere near adoption, though it was pretty neat.

      https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/06/260603023917.htm#google_vignette

      Researchers have discovered how microscopic imperfections and atomic vibrations can be used to control a powerful quantum effect in an advanced material. The effect can turn alternating electrical signals from the environment directly into the kind of current electronic devices need, without traditional components. As temperature changes, the signal can even flip direction, giving scientists a new way to tune device performance. (though there were little to no details about how much power was/could be generated at all and seemed based way more in theory than practical application)

  • 9 hours

    Dang, was just seeing a bunch of YT vids popping up about this, how it was going to be big if true.

    If they are really a fraud, how did they think they wouldn’t get caught??

    • If they are really a fraud, how did they think they wouldn’t get caught??

      That’s how Ponzi schemes work. See this thing?

      Under $50,000! All carbon fiber! Solar powered! 1,600 km range!

      This thing has been vaporware since 2009, company started 20 YEARS AGO -4,000 suckers signed up.

      It went chapter 11 in 2011.

      Bought by a Chinese company, " company stated it would manufacture 5000 vehicles by the end of 2012".

      total to date: 0.

      On December 8, 2020, the company presented a driveable prototype and started accepting reservations. By December 14 the company had over 3000 refundable preorders for $100 each. Aptera released its 2021 annual report in May 2022, stating they had 103 employees and over 18,000 reservations for their solar electric vehicle. By mid 2022, the company raised a total of $40 million, planning to get to production by the end of the year.They acquired three buildings in Carlsbad, California, with a combined space of over 100,000 sq ft (9,300 m2). In November 2022 Aptera announced they have redesigned the structural components of the vehicle, and it requires more funding before they can get to production.

      total to date: 0.

      Aptera announced in April 2025 the company raised a total of $130 million through crowdfunding and $10 million from other investors, and the company requires an additional $60 million before it can start low-volume production.

      total to date: 0.

      Aptera announced in March 2026 it has raised a further $17M, and plans starting low-scale production no earlier than March 2027 pending raising a further $50 million.

      It just goes on and on and no one is questioning the utter bullshit claims of range and solar charging and the lack of a single vehicle in 20 years.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aptera_Motors

      But when Elizabeth Holmes did this…straight to jail.

      Now in 2026, there are serious safety concerns about vehicles that look like cars but are actually motorcycles. There is a Federal bill to ban these on the table.

    • If you find out about something through YouTube ad, that’s all the proof you need that it’s a scam

      • 13 minutes

        What I don’t understand is YouTube showing me constant ads for something I’ve already bought and like. I’m not buying more earplugs, compression socks, and sports shorts any time soon.

        • It actually has a lot of times. Make lots of promises, take investor money, show “working” prototypes, release nothing.

          Sometimes, they even get away without lawsuits or criminal charges.

          There’s even a word for it: vaporware.

          • It’s basically the entire business model of kickstarter et al. to facilitate these scammers…

            • 3 hours

              I’ve had a few projects through Kickstarter face delays over the years (once for Covid, definitely don’t blame them for that) but nothing that turns into actual fraud. I know they happen, and it makes the internet news when it does, but calling it “the entire business model” is wildly cynical at best.

              As with any investment, don’t go in blind. Look at who’s behind the idea and their experience and values.

      • I feel the same way up to a point. I think that making people aware of the existence and purpose of your company and product through advertising is very useful for all parties, as a customer cannot demand a supplied item that they are unaware of.

        I feel that it crosses over into “its trash” territory when the product is aggressively marketed in a manner that distorts the facts and attempts to artificially drum up demand by inciting FOMO or through other unehical psychological tricks, all of which would be illegal in a sane world.

        If anyone ever asks you that old thought experiment about naming a field that would immediately make the world a better place if it ceased to exist, one very high quality answer for this is “marketing”. Advertising is the Siamese twin of marketing, but not the evil twin. Marketing often dresses up and pretends to be advertising, but they are distinct.

        Targeted advertising is somewhat misnamed, IMO, and is not just advertising, again wearing a disguise to look like it is. It is actually privacy invasion and stalking, and is only used for advertising. Saying its real name puts folks off for some reason.

  • Does this mean the technology is impossible at current then? Or just that the company didn’t deliver?

    • There are several companies making great leaps right now. It is still far from commercially viable yet.

      Which is why it seemed so far fetched for Donut to claim they had this battery without anyone knowing they were working on it. It was immediately suspicious.

      • It is still far from commercially viable yet.

        Solid-state sodium is still in the laboratory stage. People assumed Donut was claiming to have developed a solid-state sodium battery due to their “no lithium” statement, but they never specifically claimed they were using sodium.

        All solid-state lithium is a bit further along. Korea has pilot plants producing full-sized EV batteries that are being used for testing before they do the final scale up to production. Chinese manufacturers are also basically at the same stage. Those will likely be available in production EVs by 2030.

    • 8 hours

      Just this company that didn’t deliver. There’s still a lot of other companies doing research for solid state battery

      • 8 hours

        Who will all have a harder time finding investor money and will meet with more skepticism as development proceeds.

        Like all other aspects of our greedy scam culture, the possibility of this new battery chemistry and some of the remaining social trust has been monetized and traded for cash to line somebody’s pockets.

      • 7 hours

        You can buy a solid state battery right now on Digikey for 5 bucks. Lithium-ceramic. They suck ass. But cool tech.

    • 6 hours

      Impossible outright? No. Not possible currently? Most definitely.

  • 8 hours

    Well we all had high hopes, but if something looks too good to be true, it probably is.