- atrielienz@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
Has there ever been a litigation that Google has lost that they didn’t appeal if appeal were available?
- sonstwas@sh.itjust.worksEnglish2 hours
If you had basically unlimited money, wouldn’t you also appeal everything that you don’t like?
It’s the same with all the other big companies as well…
rob200@retrofed.comEnglish
4 hoursI actually want to find out how Google will get out of this one. Without any type of lobbying. Even in the u.s ai search promp resualts are technically considered Googles own speech and they are legally responsible. Sadly no one in government seems interested in enforcing ai and even where there is there is this push to take the power from the states to regulate ai.
Zak@lemmy.worldEnglish
9 hoursIt seems obvious to me that there’s a huge gap between a search result, which is a link and an excerpt where the operator of the linked site is clearly responsible for the content, and an AI overview, which mixes information from multiple sources with generated nonsense.
Google should absolutely be liable if it generates overviews containing defamatory lies.
Kokesh@lemmy.worldEnglish
10 hoursIt is not user submitted. These shitresults are made by Google, by their servers. They chose to put it there, knowing it may be inaccurate. So they are fully responsible.
- Yggstyle@lemmy.worldEnglish9 hours
This. 100x.
We had answer snippets long before they shit this abomination into existence. I hope they lose horribly and Germany goes for the hat trick and drops a: “oh! while you’re doing that you’ll need to remove those false results that are ads… or need to CLEARLY label them.”
I can dream.
- 🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.worksEnglish7 hours
Or they link to the real sources that might be incorrect to shift the blame, but then those sources can charge for using their data what’s even worse in the AI scraping era.
- Zwuzelmaus@feddit.orgEnglish11 hours
Google said it takes swift actions against violations of its policies for AI Overviews.
LOL Hasn’t it just been proven right here in this case that the opposite is true?
If I have read the verdict properly, even after being officially noticed and legally requested to stop the offending statements, the company did not react at all and the AI repeated it’s crap.
- Ludicrous0251@piefed.zipEnglish3 hours
“Swift” is a meaningless PR term. If they release a slightly less buggy updated Gemini 9 months later they can call it “rapid innovation” or whatever.
- Zwuzelmaus@feddit.orgEnglish2 hours
But they cannot choose their own arbitrary waiting time when legal actions are already ongoing.



