• 1 year

    I guess bridging with bluesky currently this does not make much sense to lemmy users?

    As I understand it, Lemmy users do not have public messages, so no contextless posts like on Mastodon or Bluesky. On the other hand BridgyFed does not support communities, as a community cannot follow it.

    So the way I have been using federation via ActivityHub, following communities and posting from mastodon, cannot be done from bluesky.

  • 2 years

    This seems very dangerous : just look at the photograph !

    • 2 years

      It’s not ideal but it is in place to accept the normie Twitter refugees as Twitter turns into an alt-right propaganda platform run by a shitty AI that promotes false stories.

    • Out of context, “I still dont understand why we need bluesky” sounds like something an oil executive would say. In context, I completely agree.

    • It’s a different approach with different ideas. It uses open protocols, focuses on data and account portability, and incorporates peer-to-peer concepts in its architecture. The vision behind Bluesky is to build a global square with these concepts.

      I definitely wish they would’ve extended ActivityPub and collaborated on the wider network, but I kind of understand wanting to start from scratch and not get involved with the cultural debt Mastodon brought to the network.