

It’s certainly ethical, if not legal.
You could make a good argument in court, too. Hard to show damages when there’s no possibility of profit because you’re not selling it.
It’s certainly ethical, if not legal.
You could make a good argument in court, too. Hard to show damages when there’s no possibility of profit because you’re not selling it.
I mean, it’s on brand with everything else these days: https://www.newsweek.com/how-much-trump-worth-depends-how-he-feels-384720
Still, it’s unusual for that to happen.
The digital download isn’t going away either (yet).
What data?
USB fan controller?
As a system user. Root is not recommended.
I would just go right for Debian with kde instead of making another change later on.
This. A dumbphone is private in the sense that it’s not collecting and transmitting a whole lot of data to Facebook, Google, etc., which is what most people are concerned about in this community.
If you also want encrypted communications, use something built for that purpose. But keep in mind, the other person will also have to have a compatible device, and probably isn’t as concerned about maintaining hygiene.
Yeah but we don’t like wordpress after Matt went full CEO and sued/banned wpengine.
Plastic fiber is probably a lot cheaper than copper wire, for one thing. Probably easier to multiplex too.
There’s no market. Fixed wireless is the current thing.
I’m sure it’s doable. But a cellular pay-as-you-go data plan and router is pretty common.
I don’t think telcos will even give you copper phone service any more, unless you happen to be in a covered area, or you want to pay an exorbitant amount. Most service is going to be VoIP or cellular with a desk phone.
So what account was that name associated with?
I’m not, really. I run docker-compose and it runs. That’s it.
It should delete that content too. At least as far as any of it is really ever deleted.
If you can, do it through a GDPR deletion request.
If a package manager can block an upgrade due to version dependencies, it can also pull in those dependencies for a partial upgrade.
I can’t name any cases off the top of my head, but I don’t see a reasonable court equating hypothetical future earnings with present losses.
Like if it was “he stole my harvest of beans that I was going to sell at market” then yeah the harm is obvious, but when it’s “well I’m not selling the beans now, and I’m not planning on selling them in the future, but someday I might, therefore no one else should be able to appreciate beans in the meantime” that’s ridiculous. Especially since piracy is not theft; the number of beans has not changed.