What if humans are actually remotely controlled by small alien ants?

Not using a laptop because it can distract you is like shrinking your stomach because you can’t stop eating. Oh, wait…

No need for evidence. The idea of anyone being able to claim anything about a person without proof is inherently flawed. Are you saying that the app has some magical feature which forces everyone to tell the truth? No disgruntled ex can make up things about their previous partner? I would love to see you prove that.

Would you believe me if I told you some systems are used for other things than what’s intended?

Arguing that tea was for “telling on predatory dudes” is like saying backdooring encryption is to catch people spreading CP.

Youtube and tiktok are video platforms (instagram turned into one some years after creation). Telling them to stop having videos is equivalent to saying they should cease to exist. Spotify is a music streaming platform. Telling them to stop having videos has a minimal impact on their business model, which is evident by the fact that Spotify was widely successful before they started including videos.

You forgot the most important part: no ad revenue from text posts on youtube.

I’m well aware of the website. Yet, it isn’t able to yield that sweet youtube ad revenue so it will of course not be his preferred outlet.

Stop killing games is larger than being youtube content now. News are reporting about it. How about starting a website where you present this information instead of on a youtube channel? The obvious answer to why not is that he wants the sweet ad revenue that youtube provides at the cost of wasting everyone’s time.

So there’s some magical limitation which only lets him make videos? He’s doomed to solely create videos and if he as much as thinks about writing a blog post, he gets struck by lightning or something? What an interesting phenomenon.

I see it all the time. Maybe your creators don’t care about the feature? Also, you can simply use the description of the video. Of course, this means less ad watch time so obviously not happening.

Watching/listening to a recording is faster than reading something.

That’s just wrong.

I can multitask while listening to it, for instance.

Why post it to youtube in that case? If you’re watching a video where the only the audio is relevant, why the fuck is it a video?

Total shit argument. You can publish text on youtube too.

The brilliant part about writing text is that you don’t have to read all of it. You can have sections where people can find the information they actually are interested in. The only problem is less ad money.

Why does he feel that it’s necessary to present the information by talking into a webcam? What’s wrong with publishing text?

At least e.g. steam can’t arbitrarily choose to brick your colputer

Much like every form of security measure, the intention is not to completely eliminate the possibility of an attack (which is impossible in most cases). Instead, the intention is to increase the amount of effort that’s required to make an attack.

Anti-cheat is a necessary evil for competitive online games. No one wants to play a game against cheaters since they typically have an unfair advantage. If you can’t combat cheating then you might as well not make the game since no one will want to play it. Fine by me since I don’t care for such games but I could imagine people who like playing them might prefer to play against as few cheaters as possible. What are the alternatives?