Lol, no. I don’t trust myselft to keep it well maintained, up to date, nor available when it matters most.

If everyone had a friend that had a server we coulddp some fun stuff with federation and decentralization. Decentralized federated social networks without spam and without much need for moderation. Backup (I’ve always wanted to offer friends a family a backup service. I’d like to have a friend with a server so that I can backup my backups on their sever and in exchange they can do the same on mine). Almost free hosting (if I have my own home server I could provide friends with the option to host their static site for free which could be acceded by any server on the federated network

I can’t believe you went through all my poorly written bran issues.

You are right. It should not be real time

Holly shit I do not know how you managed to read my message. I had auto correct set to Spanish.

I was picturing something realtime. You get an app where you can type your +1 and you get a list of all the guests. You tap someone you get to -1 them. At any point you might get a notification hat you have been -1’d and you can go +1 yourself and bring no one. If you are not +1ing your self then your +1 can get -1’d in which case you can’t invite someone else (I’d love to make it so that you can change your +1 to someone else but then the other person might change their -1 to the new person and it turn into a cycle, or -1 are permanent and prone to abuse)

As a fun option you can sell your -1 if you don’t plan on using it

If you self vote, you don’t get to bring anyone. Even with self voting you can get -1’d twice. Otherwise you can +1 your date, the you get -1’d and your date goes alone. Which has a high likelihood of meaning that they won’t go either

Except that he heard a ding when it hit the bottom

Y es, un the sense that if you are invited, someone uninvites you, then you can plus one yourself.

But if you bring a plus one they can me minus one’d and you can’t do anything to prevent it.

Doesnt thunderbird have irc integration?

It doesn’t bother you to see mullvard in the top all the time?

Pro tip. If you go to an apps notification settings, then set a category to silenced and option called “minimize” should show up which allows the notification to be hidden from the notification bar, but shown in the drawer

I’m on the go right now. This is a quote for an old privacy guides snapshot, but when I was looking for it, I saw some articles from April saying that this was no longer true, so further searching needed when I get home

On Android, Firefox is still less secure than Chromium-based alternatives: Mozilla’s engine, GeckoView, has yet to support site isolation or enable isolatedProcess.

Xkcd

Really? What makes you say that? Is it like a trend or something?

Lol. It’s you again. The “þ” person. I just checked my comments to make sure you were the same user. It’s hilarious to identify you by this character. Did you figure out what causes it?

Storing and serving 4/8k 60 fps video is extremely expensive. It’s not like twitter where you could run it of a phone if you wanted to.

I did some quick googling and found this. I haven’t looked too much into it yet, but it doesn’t sound like such a bad reason on the surface, although I do suspect things should be better now

From their website in the section titled “Privacy over convenience”

One of the main considerations often ignored in security and privacy comparisons between messaging applications is multi-device access. For example, in Signal’s case, the Sesame protocol used to support multi-device access has the vulnerability that is explained in detail here:

“We present an attack on the post-compromise security of the Signal messenger that allows to stealthily register a new device via the Sesame protocol. […] This new device can send and receive messages without raising any ‘Bad encrypted message’ errors. Our attack thus shows that the Signal messenger does not guarantee post-compromise security at all in the multi-device setting”.

Solutions are possible, and even the quoted paper proposes improvements, but they are not implemented in any existing communication solutions. Unfortunately this results in most communication systems, even those in the privacy space, having compromised security in multi-device settings due to these limitations. That’s the reason we are not rushing a full multi-device support, and currently only provide the ability to use mobile app profiles via the desktop app, while they are on the same network.

The main Dev gave a talk somewhere sometime where he explained why doing multi device is a security risk. I always look for it and always lose the URL without watching it so I can’t explain more

Private and anonymous are different things. While anonymity does increase privacy, it is not a strict requirement. So it this private, but not as private as possible.

The best private messenger IMO is simplex, but it not production ready yet

Some phones are starting to get limited by the size of the USB C port. So maybe.

(Latest galaxy fold)

open-source supporter and any level of rightwing is self-contradicting

Nothing surprises me since the YouTube distrotube uploaded a video with his rifle saying that “if you support free software you should support gun rights”