I particularly enjoy the fourth from the top.
- 0 Posts
- 13 Comments
- sunsofold@lemmy.zipto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•We should give names to heat waves like we give names to hurricanes.
2 daysHere comes heat wave Aaauughh.
- sunsofold@lemmy.zipto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•If we live in the simulation, the admin is probably playing as one of us
3 daysIf this is the simulation the entity that is running it is ineffably more complicated than you can possibly imagine with your tiny simulation of a brain.
- sunsofold@lemmy.zipto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•According to Lemmy Users: Blockchain was a grift, AI is a grift, Quantum computing will be a future grift. So according to you what new and emergent technologies are not / will not be a grift?
8 daysThe technologies were/are not grifts. They were used as buzzwords to enable the grift of spending investor money.
- sunsofold@lemmy.zipto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?
8 daysAssisted suicides do not consent to die. They request to die. They initiate the process themselves rather than allow the desire of others to dictate events. There is a subtle but important distinction.
- sunsofold@lemmy.zipto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?
8 daysAssisted suicide is suicide, performed by the dying individual. Assisting in a suicide is enabling a killing, but is not murder if done correctly. The one performing suicide is the active party, not simply granting consent to the actions of another.
To bring things back to the original point, rape and murder are covered by different ethical principles. Consent has no bearing on murder. Consent is definitive for rape.
- sunsofold@lemmy.zipto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?
8 daysThe moral standing of a killing is completely unrelated to consent for most people. Most would say murder doesn’t become moral because the victim was suicidal. The killing itself is the basis for the moral stance, not the desires of the victim. The act is valued. Consent is neutral.
Sexual interaction is different. It does not necessitate a state change. It can be done to positive effect if done with consent. But animals, much like children, are viewed as insufficiently capable of granting consent. The consent is the basis for the moral stance, not the act itself. Consent is valued. The act is neutral.
- sunsofold@lemmy.zipto
Asklemmy@lemmy.ml•[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?
8 daysSexual morality is rooted in consent. Mortal morality is not.
You know the only visible difference between someone who truly enjoys their solitude and someone who is lonely but making the best of it? You see the lonely one.
The contemplative is too busy with their efforts to talk to others most of the time, and when they do talk to others it’s about the work, not the solitude. The solitude is unremarkable, a side effect of the work.
- sunsofold@lemmy.zipto
Today I Learned@lemmy.world•TIL The average erect penis size is 5.5 inches, The average flaccid penis is 3.6 inches. A 6 inch penis is above avg. About 1 in 100 have an have an erect penis 7inch and above.English
15 daysNow I would like to be able to compare this source to the ones I saw years ago that said the average was 5.75 and 6.1 and compare their methodology but I don’t still have those old sources.
- sunsofold@lemmy.zipto
Showerthoughts@lemmy.world•Companies should by law have to pay you for each interview round.
17 daysIf you aren’t qualified and they have to pay for every interview, either you are being honest on your application and they aren’t interviewing you or you’re lying and you open yourself up to charges of fraud because you took money under false pretenses.




Referred to as a thorn.