uselessartifact@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•79% of smart dash cams we tested had security flaws and concerns, and in some cases they were breaking the law - Out of 28, only six didn't have any concerns.English30 daysTo be fair, if you’re intentionally only filming one specific person, I’m sure they could claim harassment at some point. Maybe public disturbance or nuisance? 1
uselessartifact@lemmy.ziptoTechnology@lemmy.world•79% of smart dash cams we tested had security flaws and concerns, and in some cases they were breaking the law - Out of 28, only six didn't have any concerns.English30 daysSpeaking as someone from the US, consent is not required to record someone in public. “There is no responsible expectation of privacy while in public.” If you don’t want to be recorded by people at random, stay home. 380%4
uselessartifact@lemmy.ziptoPrivacy@lemmy.ml•Meta Workers Say They're Seeing Disturbing Things Through Users' Smart Glasses1 monthIf you’re recording while you pee, yes. If you’re not recording while you pee, probably still yes. 7
uselessartifact@lemmy.ziptoToday I Learned@lemmy.world•TIL Ronald Reagan was deeply influnced by SciFi when implementing policy. He reportedly initiated cybersecurity changes within the DoD after watching the movie WarGames and asking if it was plausible.English2 monthsWell, it wouldn’t be a laser, more something like magnetically confined plasma. 4
To be fair, if you’re intentionally only filming one specific person, I’m sure they could claim harassment at some point. Maybe public disturbance or nuisance?