• daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m wary of external dependencies. They are cool now, but will they be cool in the future? Will they even exist?

    One thing I think p2p excels is resiliance. People be still using eDonkey even if it’s abandoned.

    A repo signature should deal with “fake copies”. It’s true we have the problem that BitTorrent protocol is not though for updating files, so a different protocol would be needed. I don’t even know how possible/practical it is. It’s true that any big project should probably host their own remote repo, and copy it on other platforms as needed. Github only repos was always a dangerous practice.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s true we have the problem that BitTorrent protocol is not though for updating files

      Bittorrent v2 has updatable torrents

    • samc@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If you’re able to easily migrate issues etc to a new instance, then you don’t need to worry about a particular service providers getting shitty. At which point your main concern is temporary outages.

      Perhaps this is more of a concern for some projects (e.g. anything that angers Nintendo’s lawyers). But for most, I imagine that the added complexity of distributed p2p hosting would outweigh the upsides.

      Not saying it’s a bad idea, in fact I like it a lot, but I can see why it’s not a high priority for most OSS devs