• Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    … I don’t think listening to random big influencers is a good way forward (in anything).

    (As to the list - others already pointed out everything, y’all nerds know shit! <3)

  • Ech@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    What exactly has he done to warrant considering this? He’s a yt star, not a privacy expert.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Just because PewDiePie switched to Linux doesn’t mean we should listen to his browser recommendations

    • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      True but he’s sparking more interest in FOSS so that’s still a good thing. I doubt his advice is perfect but if it gets more people started onto their own journey it’s a win.

  • 6R1M R34P3R@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not of his. This is a known widespread tierlist made by other person (I do not remember if this came from Reddit, a YT video or what, but it is well known)

  • M68040 [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Wait. He hasn’t crumbled into dust or whatever these “Offputting guy with shit politics who has an inexplicable army of irritating tween fans” youtubers do when they’re past their shelf life? I thought he was irritating when I was in high school. That was…what, thirteen years ago now?

  • comfy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I know it’s been said, but Brave is a hard no. Replace it with Ungoogled Chromium. I haven’t seen the video so I don’t understand why it’s in the “not ideal for a normal human” list, and I am biased since I use plenty of “not for normal” tools.

  • WQMann@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Ngl, feel like his tier list is based on usability while avoiding big tech.

    Tbh even if this tierlist is not the best or great, it still is “good enough”. Plus the most important thing is to get tons of people interested.

    I rather have “good enough” tier list that reaches to millions of people, then have a perfect tierlist that only reaches out to less than a dozen people.

    Because amongst the millions of people who are interested, thousands of them will do their own research into privacy and dig deeper into it.


    Plus right now, the biggest weakness of privacy is the fact that our community is too small to make an impact.

    Having someone give this much outreach and influence to attract attention towards privacy is a good thing. (well, as long as their advice are on the positive end of the spectrum, and pewdiepie’s advise surely is, even if its not perfect)

      • Censed@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        He barely touches on the topic of browsers, it’s like 40 second segment, i don’t think he even made the tier list.

  • AmanitaCaesarea@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ppl focusing on the negative. It’s just his subjective list. He doesn’t claim to be an expert. Lemmy autism peaking here. More exposure to foss is good guys

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Brave? Hard no. Vivaldi? Also no.

    Also, where are qutebrowser and Zen?

    qutebrowser and IceCat are real top of the game when it comes to privacy. But then, they break some of the sites functionality, especially IceCat who seems to be going under the “if your site doesn’t work, it’s your site’s problem” motto.

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Nothing in the browser should be proprietary. Any proprietary part is a possibility of malice, and browsers are mission critical.

            • LeTak@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              I don’t disagree with that. It’s just that most browsers are built that way, unfortunately. Nothing is free, not even Firefox. If you want to sell it, it’s hard to maintain reasonable expectations that people won’t just build it from source instead of buying it. Something 100% free can’t maintain itself over long time.

              • Allero@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                Firefox is open source, and while it takes some shady practices to fund it (it sure isn’t cheap to run your own damn engine alongside everything on top), I take it as a more tenable compromise.

                You can also have degoogled Chromium which is open-source if you’re into it.