I know that Linux is more secure than Windows and normally doesn’t need an antivirus, but know myself I’m gonna end up downloading something at some point from somewhere on the internet, and it would be good to be prepared. So, which antivirus would you recommend for Linux (Mint specifically) just to double up on security?

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    not necessarily, you would still be running the virus under wine, which will probably not work as intended.

    • CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wine is not an emulator. It’s not sandboxed either. If you can do it as a user, a program running in wine can do it too.

      There’s nothing stopping a piece of malware from crawling your disk for sensitive information, or encrypting your files for ransom.

        • CrackedLinuxISO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I wouldn’t think so. Isn’t bottles just an easier way to manage wine prefixes? If so, it doesn’t do anything to hide your Linux system from the executable.

          Wine prefixes are not sandboxes. They are a way to separate the windows-level configuration for different programs (eg env vars, or drivers, etc).

          Wine is a translation layer between a compiled windows binary and your Linux syscalls/libraries/device drivers/etc, nothing more.

          • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            On the bottles website, it says that the bottles are sandboxes. It has a full subsystem container for each program that is isolated from the main system (according to them I guess).

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hard disagree - the point is a decade ago there wasn’t enough Linux market share for bad actors to target Linux. Proton is a compatibility layer, which while technically being a sandbox, it isn’t designed around security the way a browser sandbox is. It would not be hard for a virus embedded in a made-for-windows program to identify that it’s actually a proton sandbox, then deploy a Linux-specific payload (assuming the malware designer gave it some forethought for that situation). Heck - there’s plenty of viruses that do their work in scripting languages that don’t care what OS you’re running on.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        we might see such malware one day, but i don’t think this has ever been done in the wild just yet.