• PugJesus@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It’s like you understand every era by the definition at the end of it. And soft power is soft because it can be denied - it’s just influence.

    Okay cool, so your argument is now nothing more than “soft power exists”, not “The Catholic Church had any serious amount of soft power”, fan-fucking-tastic, glad you’ve spent all this time to say absolutely nothing.

    Let’s go back to the source then… Who had institutionalized assimilation before the Romans? I don’t just mean there was assimilation…I mean a group comes in and converts others into becoming them in a systematic fashion

    The Ancient Hebrews, for one, whose process of assimilation was far more ritualized and rigid, and mandatory for existence in the polity, than Rome’s. The Assyrians. Han China in the Warring States period.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah ok bro. These are totally the same things.

      How about we say you win, since my goal was to be understood and we’re never getting there