notarobot@lemmy.zip to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agoOne of those funny coincidenceslemmy.zipimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up1237arrow-down17
arrow-up1230arrow-down1imageOne of those funny coincidenceslemmy.zipnotarobot@lemmy.zip to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 2 months agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squarearrow74@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·2 months agoThat 20,000 times bit is directly from the data. I read the article and it seemed pretty clear and not over exaggerated.
minus-squarenotarobot@lemmy.zipOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·2 months agoMaybe. It was just funny timing. Whoever the comic is so right that even of the number is tall, I expect to see no difference. One of the usual cool headlines that in practice mean noting
minus-squareScubus@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3·2 months agoI mean a 1000% increase in .0001% effectiveness os either really impressive, or not impressive at all depending on how you look at it.
That 20,000 times bit is directly from the data. I read the article and it seemed pretty clear and not over exaggerated.
Maybe. It was just funny timing.
Whoever the comic is so right that even of the number is tall, I expect to see no difference. One of the usual cool headlines that in practice mean noting
I mean a 1000% increase in .0001% effectiveness os either really impressive, or not impressive at all depending on how you look at it.