I want to make Linux my main OS. I’ve used Windows for decades. Since Vista or 7, the Windows security model is this, from what I understand:

  1. unprivileged programs have limited/no ability to do scary things to your computer. they might be able to read some data, but it’s not going to implant malware in the boot sequence for Windows.
  2. if a program wants escalation, it triggers a UAC popup and the user has to accept it. Remote programs cannot accept UAC on a physical person’s behalf. Escalated programs have admin level control and can do the scary things.
  3. As with any OS, there may be privilege escalation vulnerabilities that escalate (1) into (2).

I’ve only had Windows malware a few times since Win7, and the entry point was fairly avoidable. (Running a sketchy EXE, and a possible drive-by malware install via an advertisement. I could never prove the latter.)

I have never run a password on my Windows machines.


On any system, physical access is game over.


On Linux, the password is paramount. I’ve tried to understand the security model and I keep failing. Synthesizing from arch wiki

SSH

Equivalent to local physical access as the user. If it’s a sudoers or root account, it can do scary things. Not a threat if ssh is disabled or well secured (password or key pairs).

If a network has a well configured firewall (on the router), it should block ssh requests from outside the network unless the admin specifically wants SSH outside the network.

As with any OS, there may be bugs that allow remote access outside of SSH.

Local login / password prompts to physical users

Without a password, you can’t escalate to root and install new software. Some software, often dealing with hardware (smartctl) requires sudo/root to run.

Encrypted drives

Passwords can decrypt drives if they are encrypted.

Keyrings

Some DEs (KDE) offer a ‘keyring’ that stores passwords. It’s locked/encrypted with a password, usually the same as the login password.


So what am I missing? Is Windows + UAC + no password secure? What is Linux protecting us from by using passwords?

  • oscardejarjayes [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Nobody lives with you? Or visits you? You don’t use a laptop ever? What if someone does get through your locks?

    You can set empty password up pretty easily, so you’ll just press enter to get through password prompts, just like how you’d click through password-less UAC prompts. Richard Stallman used to recommend that way back in the 80’s, on the big shared University machines.

    I highly recommend a full-disk-encryption password even if you don’t have a traditional computer password, it’ll keep your data extra safe. Imagine the feds raid your house because Hexbear got designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization, the feds couldn’t get any Hexbear data off of the disk if it’s locked.

    But it really feels like even if a password doesn’t add much security-wise, there’s basically no downside to it. My password is pretty long by conventional standards, but it takes a small fraction of a second to type it all out and login.

    • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Nobody lives with you?

      My grandmother, who has no interest in my computer.

      Or visits you?

      No

      You don’t use a laptop ever?

      No

      What if someone does get through your locks?

      What if someone guesses your password? Why don’t you keep your computer in a custom built safe bolted to the floor? There’s always another level of security you could hypothetically require, I just live in reality where the truth is no one is touching my computer.

      there’s basically no downside to it.

      It takes a second or so every time (sometimes a couple of seconds, I’m not always booting my computer with the intent to type shit immediately) which adds up over time. Sometimes I mistype, wasting 10+ seconds. And the benefit of this mild inconvenience is nothing.

      • oscardejarjayes [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        What if someone guesses your password?

        It’s randomly generated, brute forcing it should take years.

        Why don’t you keep your computer in a custom built safe bolted to the floor?

        I mean, I do keep it locked to stuff with a Kensington lock.

        Sometimes I mistype, wasting 10+ seconds

        Fair, sometimes caps lock will do that to me.

        I’m not saying you have to use a password, I’m just curious. I don’t think I know anyone IRL that doesn’t use a password with their computer.

        • booty [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s randomly generated, brute forcing it should take years.

          Cool, so they use any number of exploits to simply go around the password. The point isn’t that a password is easy to get through (just like a locked door isn’t easy to get through) it is that if you’re facing a determined attacker it doesn’t matter how secure it is. If they have physical unsupervised access to your PC, you’ve already lost.

          Fortunately for us all, these determined attackers do not exist. Nobody’s breaking my windows to boot up my fucking PC. The situation in which a password would help you is if someone has gone to the effort to bypass the physical security on your home, and then has no plan to deal with a password locked computer. They just take one look at it and go “welp, that’s it, everybody crawl back through the window then, watch the glass shards” Instead of picking up the entire PC and walking off with it, or yanking out the hard drives, or booting into their own preferred OS on a USB, or whatever else would actually happen if these made up attackers were real.