• MurrayL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Right? If it still works then it still works.

    If the article was talking about anything other than tech/software, we’d be praising its longevity.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, you could read the article. Many users are unhappy with the performance or reliability.

      • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        And a lot of people are actually stuck because the Windows XP/7 machine is attached to industrial equipment that costs an unbelievable amount of money or is just impossible to replace.

    • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      It really depends what its used for.

      Anything that is public facing would never work without constant maintenance and upgrades, be it a computer OS or some complex piece of hardware.

      • mostlikelyaperson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yup, also especially for industrial applications, requirements and needs absolutely can change, and that means having to work around the equipment. I have seen firsthand the experience of trying to get new features into ancient applications. (Made worse by the fact that we took on support for it because the original company which had created the program had gone under).