• Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        53
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        They weren’t talking about the server:

        This app…works in almost exactly the same way as Signal, except that it also archives copies of all the messages passing through it, shattering all of its security guarantees.

        • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          44
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Later in the article, it talks specifically about the server-side archives being stored in plain text. That’s why the hacker was able to access messages. This isn’t about the local copies on phones.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                25
                ·
                edit-2
                18 hours ago

                You’re confused, I am not the author of this article. I did not write the statement above, just copied and pasted it here.

                • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  16 hours ago

                  I’m not confused, you’re intentionally misreading what’s happening for some reason.

                  “Passing through it” pretty clearly refers to the server as that’s what was hacked into and had plain text archives.

                  You’re hyper fixating on the fact that the article says “the app” when referring to both the phone and server pieces to try and argue… something.

                  • Ulrich@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    27
                    ·
                    16 hours ago

                    You are confused. I’m not “intentionally misreading” anything, it was written incorrectly. I’m not trying to argue anything. I’m just reading the (wrong) words used in the article. When I come across a piece of misinformation, I don’t continue reading in the hopes that they clear it up later, I write it off and close it.

                    Someone else cleared this up. There’s no reason to continue arguing about it.

            • doodledup@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Maybe you should start reading up on stuff you don’t know about before adding nonsense to internet threads.

              • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                14 hours ago

                This is now the third post in the last 24 hours where I stumble into a needlessly long thread because this user is completely obtuse and can’t handle being wrong or a different opinion.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                26
                ·
                edit-2
                17 hours ago

                Don’t know what you mean. I didn’t add any “nonsense”. Just a direct quote from the article in question.

          • 0xD@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            That doesn’t really do anything. Attackers need local access to the device to get the database itself. Chances are, they’ll get the key right with it.

            • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Molly encrypts it using a passphrase instead of a locally stored key for exactly that reason.

              • 0xD@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 hours ago

                The passphrase or the unencrypted database are still open in memory. Though that is, of course, a more complicated attack but they could simply read it through the app itself.

                • HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  You can set it to wipe them from memory on different conditions, including instantly if youre that paranoid, sure its still possible. Its an optional feature most people wont use, but its pretty well thought out.