Unnecessary and deeply concerning bow to the new “king”

Update: position got backed up by an official Proton post on Mastodon, it’s an official Proton statement now. https://mastodon.social/@protonprivacy/113833073219145503

Update 2, plot-twist: they removed this response from Mastodon - seems they realize it exploded into their face!

        • Xamrica@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          0·
          1 month ago

          I wouldn’t call it “writing on the wall,” but they have done some not-so-good things over the last few years:

          1. Handing over data for their email services (which was legally required) (ref).
          2. Releasing a Bitcoin wallet. The problem for me is that Bitcoin is inherently not private.
          3. Lying in marketing. Proton claims “no data or speed limits” for their free VPN (ref), which is just plain wrong. If you download a few gigs, it will slow you down to a few Mbit (if I remember correctly). I even contacted their support about this, and they just said, “They are balancing the servers for the free VPN.” But then why was it fast in the beginning, and if I reconnected to the same server, would it be fast again. Just to be clear: I have no problem with the speed limit/balancing itself, just that they are lying about it.
          4. Proton incentivizing free email accounts to connect to a Gmail account to get 500 MB more storage. (You need to go through the “tutorial” steps to get the 500 MB extra, and one of them is to have a Google Mail account send all their emails to your new Proton inbox.)

          This is why I personally decided against Proton.

          • s38b35M5@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            1 month ago

            These are useful data for making decisions about using their service, but not exactly indicative of support for a right wing authoritarian leader who lies more in one day than he has hairs on his entire body.

            Edit: typo

            • Xamrica@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              1·
              1 month ago

              Mostly true, that’s why I opened with “I wouldn’t call it writing on the wall.” But for me, it shows that they are not as privacy- and consumer-focused as they like to present themselves. Supporting Trump is just five steps further in this direction. (That’s just how I feel about it.)

          • sudneo@lemm.ee
            01·
            1 month ago

            1,2 and 3 are completely irrelevant. 1 is completely normal, 2 missed the point that the wallet (which I don’t use, I never owned crypto) has nothing to do with privacy and 4 is an optional marketing strategy to incentivise migration from google. Nothing is wrong with any of this.

        • huginn@feddit.it
          0·
          1 month ago

          They’ve been cooperating with law enforcement and handing data to the cops proactively since 2021.

          Pay attention.

    • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      0·
      1 month ago

      And then we have the communists making Lemmy. Is there any moderate developers lol. Valve is the only big company I can think of that isn’t annoying. All the faceless Linux devs are good too

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        1·
        1 month ago

        Glances at the child gambling enabled by the steam marketplace, an issue being blatantly ignored by Valve leadership.

        Buddy, I don’t know how to tell you this. I love Valve for all the good they do, but they got some serious skeletons, too.

        Valve representatives were asked point blank if the third party gambling sites have a positive influence on their bottom line, and the dude replying sweated bullets for several seconds before nervously going “we… don’t have any data on that” while the rest stared daggers at him.

        Coffeezilla has a recent video on the situation.

        • fleet@lemmy.ca
          1·
          1 month ago

          I love Steam, but thinking about switching to gog over this. Anybody have any ideas how we can let valve know this isn’t okay?