• Diurnambule@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah but contrary to these listed, the judge know the guardian is a newspaper, they shouldn’t be able to make him/her afraid in the same way they did.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah but contrary to these listed, the judge know the guardian is a newspaper

      The logic does not check out. Signal isn’t going to integrate a news section and then suddenly be exempt from this regulation.

      • Diurnambule@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It show you didn’t read, I am explaining the article piece by piece. They used the lost a gave you to convince a judge it was a terrorist behavior. It is not forbidden to crypt things. And they would not have been able to convince a judge the news application guardian is a terrorist tool.