• wosat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I don’t disagree with the criticisms of American cars – overpriced, uninspired, unreliable, over-engineered, etc. – but to everyone saying “we should just compete”, do you realize the realities that Chinese workers experience? Have you heard of 996? It’s shorthand for a common work schedule in China: 9am to 9pm, 6 days a week. Benefits that are common in the U.S., even in non-union shops, like retirement plans, PTO, worker’s comp, and overtime pay are rare. So, yeah, things can be made much cheaper if you are willing to feed your workforce into the grinder.

    • jarmitage@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      And that’s exactly what is coming to the US, since they think workers rights and unions are the problem.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Exactly, which is why I’m left scratching my head why the US wants to bring manufacturing back to the US. We’re much better of growing the well-paying jobs where our education systems can compete favorably vs bringing back jobs that compete with low-paying jobs…

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        LOL losers, your education is shit compared to Chinese.
        You’ve got nothing to offer to the world.

        • Hardeehar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Hold on, in advanced education here in my area of the states, almost half the population of students in classes I see are of Chinese or Indian backgrounds and most are here on foreign visas.

          If the education is so shit, why are there so many foreign students studying here and paying insane amounts of money to do so.

          • cyberwolfie@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’d think enrollment rates would be a severe lagging indicator of education quality. Institutions could likely coast on reputation for quite some time after education quality tanks. Inertia is powerful, and some could even knowingly decide to go to poor educational institutions just for the status it still gives among peers and in their community.

            That said, I have no first hand experience with US higher education, and wouldn’t know what the quality really is, just saying that enrollment rates probably aren’t a great indicator of it.

            • Hardeehar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              True, I would argue though that after a certain amount of time, nobody even cares about the quality, it’s the university name on the degree that is truly important.

              You can go anywhere on the planet even decades from now and say you’re from Harvard (take your pick) and you’ll be regarded as a knowledge god even if you were the last in the class to graduate.

              Educational quality isn’t everything for getting into a good career, it’s the reputation, and that is what schools in the US (and a few abroad) have in spades.