Sheldan@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev · 3 months agonew Date("wtf")jsdate.wtfexternal-linkmessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up112arrow-down10
arrow-up112arrow-down1external-linknew Date("wtf")jsdate.wtfSheldan@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev · 3 months agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoWhy? Why not improve JS (e.g. with Temporal), especially given how excellent Typescript is?
minus-squareSheldan@programming.devOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoI wouldn’t call typescript excellent, if I did it would be on a very low standard.
minus-squareFooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoIt unquestionably is excellent. Can you name another language in common use with a type system that’s close to the expressiveness of Typescript?
Why? Why not improve JS (e.g. with Temporal), especially given how excellent Typescript is?
JS is a lost cause.
I wouldn’t call typescript excellent, if I did it would be on a very low standard.
It unquestionably is excellent. Can you name another language in common use with a type system that’s close to the expressiveness of Typescript?