Finally it seems the end of Reddit is near.

  • genevieve@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Reddit has stressed that this system is only to verify users’ age, and it has no interest in your identity. Lee further stated that Persona won’t know what subreddits you visit, and has promised it won’t keep users’ uploaded images more than seven days.”

    Press X to doubt.

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Under the new UK law, lemmynsfw would also need to have some kind of age verification for UK users.

        • .Donuts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          This. Can’t believe we’re seeing “lol Reddit sucks” when this is a country-wide implementation and has nothing to do with Reddit in particular.

        • ptu@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Just curious, how would this happen in practice? As I understand lemmy instances are defederated across the globe. Who would they send their demands to? Also there is already some nsfw content in lemmy, are those expected to respond now in some way?

        • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Real talk - or what? If LemmyNSFW isn’t based in the UK, what can they do?

          Block it? I’d rather have that than deal with processing users face data.

          • Teal@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Even though LemmyNSFW is outside of the UK the admins of any instance will be responsible for verification of UK users because of this law. This is why .zip (Lemmy and PieFed) have geoblocked the UK. It’s a lot of work and responsibility to take on.

            Here’s the post from DemiGodrick explaining this situation better than I can.

            Important News - Geoblocking of the UK

            • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yeah only if the UK can actually manage to enforce any consequences to site admins outside the UK. I’ll wait and watch.

          • TheNamlessGuy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            While I don’t know this situation, in general it tends to be up to the site to block access, rather than the other way around. If they don’t, some government branch may issue a fine to the server owners, and if it doesn’t get paid it’s seen as a crime committed in the UK. Might mean the fineé gets banned, the country they live in might get an extradition order, or whatever.

            Again, no idea about this case in particular. This is just based on what I’ve seen under similar rulings.

            • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Well as a Lemmy admin I’ll see if they seriously enforce this on international sites. If not, I won’t worry about it. If so, the UK gets blocked. 🤷🤷🤷

              I doubt they’ll be going after niche sites anyway. Big dogs like reddit, sure. Sites dedicated to porn probably. Everyone else? Doubt it.

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Or it can just defederate from UK based instances.

          .zip has already been trying to figure out how to handle this law, its also UK based.

          • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Lemmy.zip blocks uk users on its front end but I think its contents is still federated.

    • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Very careful wording there to switch between Persona and Reddit to conveniently omit one from the justification given by the other.

  • genevieve@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    The “won’t somebody please think of the children” rhetorical tactic is always just a pretext for authoritarianism, mass surveillance and data privacy intrusion. Always. It’s the perfect motte-and-bailey: when you attack the actual motives, the motte becomes, “So you don’t care about children?”

    • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      UK is full blown authoritarian now. They have been arresting journalists who are covering the genocide in Gaza and designated a direct action protest group as a terrorist organisation.

    • survirtual@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      These assholes are all pedophiles and they use it to control the planet. To get to high levels of government, you must enter the shadow contract of pedophilia. It is easy to control people and trust people with that kind of shadow on them, so it is required.

      Then they turn around and use pedophilia to control everyone else. Any tech that threatens their power, they can immediately shutdown by pedo-bombing it. The counter to pedobombing is authoritarian moderation. Once you have that, it is over. The government they control now can control the mods, and that means they control the narrative. THAT is one of the core enemies to fight. An alternative to Reddit or any other system is not enough.

      Because pedophilia is such a taboo / social death sentence, it is among the most powerful shadow contracts.

        • survirtual@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Those that have entered into the shadow contract. A shadow contract is one of few mechanisms to enter large-scale consensus (it isn’t THAT large when compared to a solar or galactic scale, but large enough for planetary control, and with some clever management, can scale larger).

          Consensus requires untrusted sovereigns agreeing to collective action. It is a very difficult mechanism to operate. One way is by having a crime so heinous, the mass population block would eviscerate you if it came to light.

          Pedophilia is king among these shadow cornerstones. It illustrates a total lack of empathy, no protective nature towards the innocent, no concern for the perceptions of society, high intellect / manipulation abilities, and a willingness to do anything. You can say it is the “panther” among the shadows.

          So most leadership is among that tribe, which is why they are the way they are. It is only logical.

          There are other tribes as well. Use your imagination and the answers will follow.

          Funny thing, Reddit did that “circle” event many years ago. How big did anyone’s circle get? That is an example of what I am explaining. It is nearly game theoretically impossible to have large scale consensus without some mechanism to make sure people are on the same page.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, I will definitely trust an internet stranger with my face so they can verify that I’m not underage to access content which could, in case of being leaked, damage my reputation or even destroy my life.

    DEFINITELY

  • BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is a combination of terrible legislation in the UK meets awful social media site.

    The Online Safety Act is an abomination, compromising the privacy and freedom of the vast majority of the UK in the name of “protecting children”.

    I’m of the view parents are responsible for protecting their children. I know it’s hard but the Online Safety Act is not a solution.

    All it will.do is compromise the privacy and security of law abiding adults while kids will still access porn and all the other really bad stuff on the Internet will actually be unaffected. The dark illegal shit on the Internet is not happening on Pornhub or Reddit.

    The UK is gradually sliding further and further into censorship, and authoritarianism and all the in the name of do gooders. It’s scary to watch.

    • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The solution to all of this “think of the children” stuff is that devices owned/used by children should have to be registered as a child’s device, which would enable certain content blockers.

      Forcing adults to verify their identity, rather than simply activating some broad based restrictions on devices being purchased for child use, is a waste of time. Kids will still find workarounds. Adult privacy will be compromised.

      Its also an easily enforceable policy to require registration of children’s devices. You can hold the parents to compliance. You can hold the carriers to compliance. Its truly the simplest way to keep kids from accessing porn without having to mess with adult use of the internet whatsoever

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The solution to all of this “think of the children” stuff is that devices owned/used by children should have to be registered as a child’s device, which would enable certain content blockers.

        That’s kinda the case right now already, but the problem is that adult-only sites don’t work with that currently.

        So the right solution would be to mandate that e.g. all sites are required to return a header with an age recommendation or something similar, so that a device set to child-mode then can block all these sites. And if a site doesn’t set the header, it will also get blocked on child-mode devices

        Wouldn’t be too hard to do, and accidental overblocking would only occur on child-mode devices, so there’s not much of a loss there.

        Legislation could then be focussed on mandating that these headers aren’t falsely set (e.g. a porn site setting the header to child-friendly).

        • iii@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Allow listing sounds like the better solution. Ie the device had a list of remotes approved by the parents.

          That way there’s no need to police every website in the world in perpetuity.

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Listing already exists, but in practice it’s quite impractical, mainly because it’s either not granular enough or too granular.

            If the listing feature allows me to allow/deny on a domain basis, then allowing Wikipedia for example would mean that I’d also allow all the non-child-friendly content on there too. Like the literal full-length porn videos or the photographies of genital torture that are on there. And if I block all of Wikipedia, I also block all of the hundreds of thousands of informative and totally child-acceptable pages on there.

            If, on the other hand, I allow/deny on a per-page basis, then using the internet becomes nigh unmanageable, because each click of my kid requires me to allow/deny the next page. It’s not that often when using the internet that you access the same exact url every day without clicking to sub-pages.

            A header would solve that issue. That way I could e.g. allow all Wikipedia articles that are rated for ages 6 and that’s ok. The rating should of course be like for movies, so that it doesn’t mean that a child would understand the articles, but that there’s nothing child-endangering in there like the videos and images (and accompanying texts) mentioned above.

            • iii@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Or just block wikipedia and use one of the many encyclopedia websites designed for kids instead (1), (2). This has the benefit of having your goals met, without making the world a worse place for everyone else.

              • squaresinger@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Did you not read my proposal? How does sending a header with extra information make the world a worse place for everyone else?

                Please explain in detail, so I know you aren’t just a troll who needs to oppose everything just because?

                • iii@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  How does sending a header with extra information make the world a worse place for everyone else?

                  It still requires arbitration of every digitally communicated thought, whether it’s age appropriate and to what degree. It’s mass thought policing, as well as trying to enforce a cookiecutter morality on every person.

                  I get the desire to enforce thoughts on someone else. But fight it, please. At least let people be free in their own mind.

                  Especially since the tools to achieve your stated goal, protection of your child(red), are already available. So you can perform your censorship desire in the confinement of your family bubble. No need for collateral damage.

    • SippyCup@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The online safety act isn’t actually about protecting children. That’s a smoke screen for a surveillance bill. They want to eliminate anonymity online.

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      If a politician says it’s to help the children, it’s almost safe to assume they themselves rape children, at least in America.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, fuck all that.

    Guess we’re transitioning into a VPN only future.

    We have the opportunity to head into a utopic or dystopic future and we’re absolutely choosing the dystopic one.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      They’ll criminalize personal VPN users for non-work purposes, next.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Work VPN doesn’t look any different to any other VPN to the people tapping the lines.

      • breecher@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Indeed. With our current system it was only a matter of time. As soon as the internet became a default thing which everyone needed to access just to function in their daily lives, it would of course be subjected to the exact same exploitative mechanisms that the non-internet part of our lives have suffered from since the dawn of history.

  • #!/usr/bin/woof@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    What’s to stop uploading a random picture of a person? Or even an AI generated person? I get what they’re trying to do, but seems like legislative theater more than anything.

    • iii@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’ve once attempted to open a bank account where they wanted video proof, and expected me to say a randomly assigned phrase. I didn’t do it.

      Fucking KYC is BS.

    • Technofrood@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      So from my experience of these type of systems (mostly in the context of banking services) they normally want to use your devices camera to take the picture directly, and normally also want a photo of a photographic ID to compare against.

      • manualoverride@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Let’s not forget all that lovely metadata they can harvest by accessing the camera module, including the exact GPS co-ordinates the picture was taken.

      • Babalugats@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Within banking apps it has become the norm, it shouldn’t mean it’s acceptable, but for the wider community it is accepted.

        But for a fucking forum?? Christ. Especially at a time when Europe are trying to establish digital sovereignty and all of the stories coming out about the US government having access to data. We already know that they are willing to share that with the highest bidder (s).

        People would have to be absolute morons to upload anything personal to Reddit, nevermind your photo ID like a passport or driving licence. But obviously that’s what they’re banking on (people being morons).

  • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    To follow compliance with the Know Your Customer Pornographic Materials Act, please use the following guidelines for your photograph:

    1. The picture must be clear, at least 720x480p.

    2. The picture must include your entire body, including your head and toes. Portrait only. *This helps us identify you better.

    3. Please remove any articles of clothing, your body must be unimpeded by any obstruction. *Burqas and other headscarves must be removed, no exceptions.

    4. If you were assigned female at birth, you will be required to rotate 180 degrees and upload another portrait photograph of your back. *Please use only your valid binary gender at birth, either male or female.

    5. Further requests for identification photos are at our discretion, our board has full authority. You may be required to upload alternative photos, such as positions bending over to help us identify your genitalia to ensure it matches your birth gender.

    Thank you for using Persona. For any questions or complaints, please direct them to: [email protected]. Please allow up to 14 days for an initial response, and 88 hours for subsequent replies.

      • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Harassment will not be tolerated. Your comment has been sent to the board for review and we will decide whether your identity will be removed from Persona. We are not obligated by law to communicate the outcome. You may receive a writ for violating Amendment 3 C, “Requirement of official identification”, the pecuniary fine is at our discretion.

  • bnrnrtbgd@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    If the UK is going to require adult verification it should be built into your internet contract. Yeah, I’m an adult. I’m paying my bills, of course I’m a fucking adult. I over pay for this garbage internet.

    Uploading a selfie? The ai is going to determine if you’re over 18? Can the ai determine if the selfie is also ai?

    • Denjin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      What if I’m actually a set of traffic lights and the AI can’t work out what I am from my selfie?

    • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, it’s some serious BS. They are forcing you to hand over and trust Reddit with your personal information, yet I wouldn’t trust them if my life depended on it.

      At the very least, someone in charge of this legisltion should learn OAuth2 and force the sites they want to comply by only let those OAuth2 accounts access their adult content. If I was in the UK, I’d just pay for a VPN over giving my photo to Reddit. That site is a lobby brigade hellhole whose “we know your dark secrets, we know everything” owner is also probably trading your account details on the side.

      • tempest@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        The current answer is that it is very difficult to determine if something was AI generated at scale, and if someone puts some effort in its effectively impossible currently.

  • ageek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Next in the news: “500k Usernames, Passwords and biometric data leaked in the latest hack”

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Remember those are just the ones you hear about. Plenty happen and are never talked about by either side for obvious reasons.

  • minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    We thought the same thing about Netflix with the sharing password bans. Yet they retained more profit than ever the next year.

    Who’s to say if this is what will make Reddit end, or did they actually just got more successful after the end of 3rd party apps compared to the declaration of so many users back then?

    Digital personal verification is just going to become a fact of life in the future for everyone born after about 2012. They will use online ID cards, biometrics, location metadata that is constantly uploaded by our devices, maybe even implanted RFID encrypted chips for account verification. Passwords are becoming outdated and outmoded for security as we speak here. 2FA is the minimum security for online today but that may soon become outmoded as well.

  • Frenchfryenjoyer (she/her)@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This is the facebook “show a video of your face” bs all over again. glad i don’t have an account on either site bc not only is it a huge privacy concern, you know they store all that data and are going to sell it and/or use it to train AI models