mesa@piefed.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoGiving Up on Element & Matrix.orgxn--gckvb8fzb.comexternal-linkmessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down13
arrow-up13arrow-down1external-linkGiving Up on Element & Matrix.orgxn--gckvb8fzb.commesa@piefed.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squareundrwater@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoDefine secure. You can run your own network.
minus-squareInFerNo@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoThe argument has always been, if when chat rooms are public, anyone can join and start logging the chats, encryption does nothing. It has the ability to connect over TLS, but that’s about it. I loved using it for its simplicity, except when using all the different flavours of nick registration (Q, NickServ, …).
It is entirely insecure.
Define secure. You can run your own network.
The argument has always been, if when chat rooms are public, anyone can join and start logging the chats, encryption does nothing.
It has the ability to connect over TLS, but that’s about it.
I loved using it for its simplicity, except when using all the different flavours of nick registration (Q, NickServ, …).