• rottingleaf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think it’s the other way around. See, hosting a service on the Internet carries some obligations.

    The state treats them so that those are much easier to fulfill for these platforms.

    The state gives them very expensive projects.

    The state kills Aaron Schwartz, purely coincidentally also the author of the RSS standard. That thing that comes the closest to a uniform way of aggregating the Web, which would kill a lot of what platforms provide.

    The state makes some of their products standard for the state, making those commercial things necessary to interact with the state.

    So, the state does a lot to give them that monopoly in the first place.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      the state does a lot to give them that monopoly

      yes that’s precisely what i implied, because they control it in the first place. companies like amazon are more powerful than nation states, and they exercise that power.

      if they make a big mistake or want labour law adjusted, they can get the state to coddle them, because they privately control, say, the entire food supply (ie the means of production) without which the state has no power.

      this has been the capitalist state’s modus operandi for more than 100-200 years. and the oligarch’s power precede it, they shaped it that way back then.

      aaron schwartz was literally just a dude, a tiny player in the game with not even a slight base of comparison with the oligarchs. shit, having a couple million dollar net worth is still not enough to be powerful like oligarchs.