• kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s about the danger posed by a monolithic government or corporation deciding what things get to be traded and sold. Like a fucked up capitalist version of that poem “First They Came”.

    • Vroomfondel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh, interesting! I know the poem. But I find it a harsh comparison to the situation about Valve’s new regulation. And I did not see it as such a highly-charged political topic. But apparently it is. To me it does not look like “a monolitic corporation”, as you can still buy games elsewhere. But I surely see the influence that the big banks/transactors have on Valve here. - But would you limit this? Any technical solutions? On the other hand, if Valve would have implemented stricter rules for critical games themselves earlier, we would not have that problem/discussion now. (Please also see my other answer below.)

      • kieron115@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        To be clear, I’m talking primarily about Visa and Mastercard, the payment processors, not Valve. Those two companies have a pretty big stranglehold on the payment processing industry outside of possibly east Asia? I heard japan has their own payment processor, I assume it isn’t limited to just Japan.