• scratchee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “Safeguards and regulations make business less efficient” has always been true. They still avoid death and suffering.

    In this case, if they can’t figure out how to control LLMs without crippling them, that’s pretty absolute proof that LLMs should not be used. What good is a tool you can’t control?

    “I cannot regulate this nuclear plant without the power dropping, so I’ll just run it unregulated”.

    • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Some food additives are responsible for cancer yet are still allowed, because they are generally more useful than have negative effects. Where you draw the line is up to you, but if you’re strict, you should still let people choose for themselves

      LLMs are incredibly useful for a lot of things, and really bad at others. Why can’t people use the tool as intended, rather than stretching it to other unapproved usages, putting themselves at risk?