• TomMasz@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s no telling if that hasn’t already happened. Europe needs to drop Microsoft ASAP.

  • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Anyone wonder where your country’s health records about all their citizens are stored? I’m guessing it’s all on either MS, AWS, or Google. That means Trump could get access to your medical history.

    This is important because of his attacks on LGBTQ people, vaccines, abortion, autism, and who knows what other nonsense he wants to persecute.

    And here in Canada the Liberal government is putting forth bill C-2, which opens up even more access to the US to get even records stored in Canada by Canadian companies.

    https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/07/canadas-bill-c-2-opens-floodgates-us-surveillance

    Feel safe yet?

    • smiletolerantly@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      In the case of Germany: confidential computing tech ensures all data is encrypted in storage and in memory, shielded even against data center employees / hosting providers. I imagine that’s become the standard for most countries.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can EU please make an open source phone?

    We have linux for computers, but we need a “linux” for phones (yes I know Android uses Linux Kernel, I’m talking about like a Libre Non-Google OS)

    • octopus_ink@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      My assumption for many years now has been that the answer to any question involving MS giving access to your data is “yes.”

  • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean. They’re a USA company. Of course they would be required to follow the laws of the country in which they HQ. Did anyone think anything different?

  • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have been saying this for more than a decade. Shit like this is why privacy laws and stuff regarding warrants and other stuff need to be expanded to private entities as much, if not more so, than government agencies. In the past the idea of a company having that much access to people’s information was unthinkable, and in almost everyone’s mind it was governments we needed to be worried about.

    But that hasn’t been true since the 90s at least with credit cards being used for most stuff and internet purchases being the norm for almost everything.

    Governments in the past needed something to ask for permission to look into you… but companies never did, and since the only thing governments need to do is either buy it or ask nicely it makes many protections kinda moot. The fact that many countries want a strict surveillance state over everyone means even the classic protections we had for a brief while are disappearing, too.

    If there ever is a 2nd enlightenment with protections for people it needs to make the stuff written in the 18th and 19th century look like children’s toys in comparison.

    If you say ‘but what about terrorism and bad people?’ Look around you. They still exist and still rarely get caught unless they fuck up badly. Most of the time it still due to informants and people talking to authorities. In the US the murder rate resolution is only 50% (and that is just arrested and charged, not convicted) and this is because there is a massive distrust of the police. In other countries people are more likely to assist the police and/or they take their jobs far more seriously in terms of forensics… and on top of that they usually have a far lower murder rate which allows more time and resources to be funneled into solving major crimes.

    Better to let 100 guilty men go than 1 innocent person convicted is the usual motto, but they don’t believe that in practice. In reality they are very much kill them all and let God sort out his own. And we can’t keep allowing that shit to happen.

  • kleingartenganove@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    As an EU citizen, I don’t find the idea of the US government having access to my data nearly as frightening as the idea of my own government getting into my accounts.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    So how are American companies any different then Chinese? Everyone always says Chinese companies have to listen to their government. Never got how American companies would be any different.

    • MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re not different at all - the CLOUD Act (2018) and FISA courts already gave the US govt near-complete access to American tech companies’ data regarldess of where it’s physically stored, we just don’t talk about it as much as we do with China.

    • archchan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Because the one in the US is working out so well for humanity right?

      Fuck Silicon Valleys. Use and support open standards and software.