• zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    This sounds like victim-blaming. This website didn’t even secure their database with a password. Come on. I’m sure their privacy policy gave the standard promises about storing their private data in a secure way, which they did not do.

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      In the current environment, at-risk people (women, immigrants, etc) who might have “at-risk” activities (abortion, immigration, etc) don’t have the luxury of relying on a privacy policy. I am not blaming them, I am simply stating how it must be if they are to avoid adverse actions.

      This particular instance involved poorly secured data; what happens when warrantless demands are made by the government?

      The Tea debacle proves that sensitive data cannot be trusted once out of your hands.

      • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I agree. The reality is that nobody should be trusting these platforms with such sensitive data. As demonstrated, there is so much that can go wrong when you trust these companies. This is a LOT of risk for very little reward.
        Whatever you put online you should think “what if this were made public and attributed to me” before you post it.

    • DrSteveBrule@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Encouraging people to be safe and care about their privacy on the internet is not victim blaming.

      I’m sure their privacy policy gave the standard promises about storing their private data in a secure way, which _they did not do. _

      This is what people want to warn others of. The developers of Tea are hardly the only offenders. Definitely not an example of victim blaming.