• Bennyboybumberchums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I can not wait, until the time of the perpetually seeking attention moron ends. Its always something with these fucking people. If you dont wanna use AI, just dont use it. Theres no fucking gun to your head. And we dont need to know youre not using, much less, find out youve got a dumb fucking name for yourselves.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re not wrong. I am skeptical of AI, and I worry if that makes me a Luddite. I think refusing to use it for anything probably does qualify one as a Luddite. Using it for limited purpose with oversight is the correct approach.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Get out of here with your nuanced take. This is Lemmy, we hate AI it uses up 1bazinga gigalitres of water each time you look at it.

        Now excuse me while I go play some video games and search Google, those things use zero electricity.

    • npdean@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I hate this attitude from people who don’t even try things before saying they are not missing out. Try AI! You have to experience the head bashing, head scratching time sink, after which you do a manual search anyways. It is a marvellous wonder how bad modern “cutting edge” tech can be.

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I also try, but it is invoked on my behalf. For instance, at work if I make a pull request now multiple AI bots are summoned to give an analysis of my code changes. It’s extremely verbose and annoying, and I think basically nobody reads it because all it does is just spam the comments section with way too much text.

      I vehemently hate OpenAI, ChatGPT, et al. At least it’s funny when it summarizes my changes as significant improvements that improve code maintainability. I guess getting glazed by the bot in a way my manager can see is helpful to my career? Though honestly he probably also doesn’t read that shit. So glad all this energy is wasted for nothing.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m an LLM freegan, I guess. But I’m cutting back too, the usefulness peaked.

    • rhythmisaprancer@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      freegan

      If they had come up with something original like that, it would have been better. But creating constructive neologisms takes work, I guess.

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Try if one of the following strikes your fancy

        AIniks
        NoBots
        Cogclean
        Algorejects
        Synthephobes

        I quite like synthephobes !

        Synthless
        Cogstainers
        Analogians

        • rhythmisaprancer@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not sure if AInik works, wouldn’t that mean they are a fan of AI? Also unsure of the synth- options as a friend of synthesizer musicians, but as a non musician maybe I should use that myself 🤔 I can’t interpret analogian without help…

          But the others sound pretty great! Cogstainers is awesome because it can be reworked into different word types. Verbs, adjectives. Incredible.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It was always about worker’s rights anyways:

      Malcolm L. Thomas argued in his 1970 history The Luddites that machine-breaking was one of the very few tactics that workers could use to increase pressure on employers, undermine lower-paid competing workers, and create solidarity among workers. “These attacks on machines did not imply any necessary hostility to machinery as such; machinery was just a conveniently exposed target against which an attack could be made.”[10] Historian Eric Hobsbawm has called their machine wrecking “collective bargaining by riot”, which had been a tactic used in Britain since the Restoration because manufactories were scattered throughout the country, and that made it impractical to hold large-scale strikes.[13][14] An agricultural variant of Luddism occurred during the widespread Swing Riots of 1830 in southern and eastern England, centring on breaking threshing machines.[15]

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luddite

      It was about making sure that as mechanization resulted in a lower need for labor, that workers compensation remained steady, and they worked less hours.

      People hating luddites is just the result of centuries old propaganda from the wealthy

  • JohnnyFlapHoleSeed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Stupid title, but in all honesty, now would be the time to create a new religion where there are restrictions on hyper modern things like AI, robotics, etc.