The software was classed as munitions and one needed an arms dealer’s license to publish it, including online. The creator of PGP published the full source code as a book, as these are covered under first amendment rights.

  • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    Fun fact: They made encryption on Ham/GMRS radios illegal because they didn’t want the average citizenry to have access to secure off-grid comms without government spyware on networks that they control.

    Reject Smarphones, Return to Amateur Radios. Just modify some radios, add a raspberry pi to do enccyption on the voice before it gets transmitted.

    THEY CANT ARREST US ALL! (seriously tho, I haven’t heard of the FCC actually doing anything, unless you were jamming the airport radios or something crazy)

        • dmention7@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Playing Devil’s Advocate - If the classification of “munitions” effectively provided all the legal protections and requirements that they wanted to apply to encryption software, it would have been a lot of wasted time and effort to create a new classification and then update all the other legal documents to include and refer to that new classification.

          Like, I don’t even want to guess how many references to “munitions” exist in various laws and regulations that would have then needed to be reviewed, amended, debated in committees, and ultimately voted on.