Twice in the past fews days, I’ve gotten a reply from a Mastodon user complaining that I should have put the direct link to an article.

  • On Lemmy I posted the direct link to the article as usual
  • On their Mastodon feed, I appear as a Mastodon user that posted a link to a Lemmy thread

It seems that threadiverse posts are being seen by more mastodon users now, which is great, but maybe the formatting could use some improvements?

Example 1:

Example 2:

I know Mastodon got “quote posts” recently, is that related to this change?

Is Mastodon also getting a “group” view? That might be the best solution to the problem

  • julian@activitypub.space
    2·
    7 days ago

    Not necessarily, no. Content warnings were implemented in Mastodon specifically as summary plus sensitive=true. Perhaps not originally, but that is enforced now (all CW’d posts from Mastodon are marked sensitive). Might be Mastodon will CW notes that don’t have sensitive, out of caution, but this doesn’t apply to non-Notes.

    So a summary included in a non-Note is not CW’d by Mastodon currently.

    • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.ukEnglish
      2·
      7 days ago

      So a summary included in a non-Note is not CW’d by Mastodon currently.

      I know, I was just saying that it prevents a non-Note from being CW’d, as the summery is used as the post’s content.

      • julian@activitypub.space
        2·
        7 days ago

        I suppose, although in that scenario theoretically one could add as:sensitive to mark the status as CW’d? I don’t think CW logic is even run for non-Notes at the moment, though I could be mistaken.

        • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.ukEnglish
          2·
          7 days ago

          Masto interprets a Note set as as:sensitive without a summary to mean ‘blur any media attached, but don’t collapse the text content’. I believe the same is true for non-Notes, but obviously without the summary = CW logic.