• Samskara@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Here’s a video of what happened back then.

    1. The ship was boarded by Israeli soldiers rappelling down ropes from a helicopter. They were armed with paintball guns.
    2. A number of Islamist activists attack the soldiers with metal poles, knives, and other improvised weapons. Several Israeli soldiers are injured, one thrown down to the next level.
    3. Second wave of soldiers comes in with guns. Nobody on board that was peaceful got killed.
    • brachiosaurus@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If israel has the right to defend themself from terrorists, these people had the right to defend themself from pirates.

      • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Blockade Running is a hostile act. Intercepting a blockade runner is not piracy.

        Piracy means stealing the cargo, the ships, and holding the crew and passengers for ransom. Israel did nothing of these. The ships were returned, the prisoners released, the aid cargo was delivered by truck to Gaza.

          • Samskara@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            A blockade can be enforced in international waters. A ship that’s heading straight towards territorial waters and doesn’t change course when hailed, can be intercepted before it enters.

            If you want to actually learn about this, start reading here.

            https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/leiden-journal-of-international-law/article/use-of-force-against-neutral-ships-outside-territorial-waters/56CF204865927A59302B21DCB66D9428

            The International Law Association’s Helsinki Principles on the Law of Maritime Neutrality (1998) regulate the same question in Paragraph 5.1.2, which largely overlaps with the provisions of the San Remo Manual. Subparagraph 3 allows attacking of neutral ships that ‘are believed on reasonable grounds to be carrying contraband or breaching a blockade, and after prior warning they intentionally and clearly refuse to stop, or intentionally and clearly resist visit, search, capture or diversion’.

            The San Remo Manual and the Helsinki Principles both contain provisions that permit the use of force against neutral ships that are ‘believed on reasonable grounds to be … breaching a blockade’. Blockades are ‘a belligerent operation to prevent vessels and/or aircraft of all nations … from entering or exiting specified ports, airports, or coastal areas belonging to, occupied by, or under the control of an enemy nation’.Footnote 18 Blockades are indiscriminate, in that they must be ‘enforced against every vessel of every nation’

            EEZ is not the same as territorial waters.