This question has bothered me quite a bit, and I’m seeking clarity for this specific question for several reasons:
- My friend (same age/gender) is quite time constrained and can’t do long meetings, frequent meetings, or dedicate time on his end to commute
- Because of so, I’m willing to tolerate commuting 2 hours one way (4 hours round trip) to his place - Why? Because I don’t enjoy online texting in the slightest and find it to be a waste of time, I value regular in person interaction the most, so that’s why I myself am willing to dedicate my own time to commute the entire length to his place.
- The 2 hour one way commute limits the ability to do early and late meetings, due to sleep and meals, so figuring out what exactly is the shortest meeting length to justify a 4 hour round trip commute is key for me.
- I have already asked a sibling of mine to articulate what he thinks (he’s happily car free and takes city transit everywhere), he tells me that he thinks a 0.5:1 ratio of meeting time to travel time is sufficent (i.e. base the shortest meeting on a 1 way commute, if a 1 way commute is 2hrs, then the shortest meeting is 2hrs). His advice means that for every minute I travel/commute, I would only get 30 seconds of meeting time. I’m still torn whether this ratio is worth it, so I want more input on this. I would value trying to do at least 1 in person meeting per calendar month with my friend, as we both live in the same city.
So what would be a good ratio of meeting time to round trip travel time? What’s the shortest meeting length duration that justifies a 4 hour round trip commute (2 hours one way)?
Aside from this being an entirely personal question that nobody else can answer for you, I think it’s getting to see your friend that justifies the drive, not the amount of time you spend with them. I had a commute like this to see one of my buddies for a while; sometimes we’d spend as little as an hour, sometimes 8. The 4-hour round trip each time isn’t what I remember.
I should probably add some commuting context. The trip from my place to his place via city transit requires taking 5 different lines, 2 buses at either end, and 3 subways in the middle. Plus I need to carry my belongings in a heavy backpack the whole way too.
So it goes like this: 8 min bus ride -> transfer -> 8 minute subway ride -> transfer to another subway -> 8 minute subway ride -> transfer to one more subway -> 8 minute subway ride -> transfer -> 45 minute bus ride.
It’s quite the chore, so sometimes when I get to his place I’m a bit exhausted, yet I need to save some energy for the trip back home in reverse (there’s no other routes or means to get between our places).
Like I said above, I don’t enjoy online texting and find it worthless and a waste of time to me, and as such in person interaction is what I cherish the most; so that’s why I am so hung up on the time ratio question. I’m willing to go to his place as my friend has very little time to commute himself.
Yeah, I didn’t miss that bit.
This is still a non-sequitur for me. How’s this for a ruleset:
What about alternatives like crashing at his place every once in a while?
Just remember, this isn’t a negotiation - I’m not the one getting you there and back. I’m just trying to give you another way of looking at it in case that makes it easier to figure out.
Jesus Christ, just meet in the middle.