• Prathas@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    No, ADB will still allow installation of anonymous apps. All this hullabaloo is talking about non-ADB installation.

    • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      He’s not wrong in a way. If ADB is overwhelmingly used and “undesirable” apps (vanced and “streaming apps”) don’t see any drop in support or usage, or if governments see a massive number using this to fly under the surveillance radar, they’ll restrict ADB too…

      Likely they’ll pull what Meta did and make everyone who wants to enable “developer mode” will actually need to prove they are indeed, a developer.

      • Prathas@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        Well, I’m not a dev and did that just for SideQuest access, so it’s easy enough… but yeah, for those wishing (near-)total anonymity, I see what you mean…

    • DanVctr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Oh word? I feel slightly better then. Still going to make it more of a pain to install ad block on my parents new devices

      • Prathas@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        Right, so the issue is how many devs will stay motivated to keep developing knowing that staying unregistered may significantly reduce users’ draw…