Toasted_Breakfast@lemmy.today to Privacy@lemmy.ml · edit-224 hours agoI Tried the "Criminal's" Phone of Choice for a Monthm.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up121arrow-down154file-text
arrow-up1-33arrow-down1external-linkI Tried the "Criminal's" Phone of Choice for a Monthm.youtube.comToasted_Breakfast@lemmy.today to Privacy@lemmy.ml · edit-224 hours agomessage-square27fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·6 hours agoIt’s what makes him relevant. Your personal feelings are not a valid reason.
minus-squareGeodad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·5 hours agoThey could be bots or socks, he could have paid for them. He did have a scandal where he lost a lot of followers (me included). That doesn’t make him relevant. 🤷♂️
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·5 hours agoThey’re not. And you know they’re not.
minus-squareGeodad@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-24 hours agoI don’t know anything about him since I stopped following him. The only thing I know is that he’s not trustworthy.
minus-squareUlrich@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·4 hours agoOk so now we’ve moved the goalposts from “relevant” to “trustworthy”?
That’s not a valid reason.
It’s what makes him relevant. Your personal feelings are not a valid reason.
They could be bots or socks, he could have paid for them. He did have a scandal where he lost a lot of followers (me included).
That doesn’t make him relevant. 🤷♂️
They’re not. And you know they’re not.
I don’t know anything about him since I stopped following him. The only thing I know is that he’s not trustworthy.
Ok so now we’ve moved the goalposts from “relevant” to “trustworthy”?
Not really. He’s neither.