• kalkulat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    They should never have been allowed to become gambling chips.

    Noone should be allowed to purchase a home without agreeing to live in it full time for at least a year afterwards. Split it into a duplex to become a landlord? Another year. Wanna be a landlord? You must live in that building full time along with your tenants. Outrageous? Not nearly as outrageous as homelessness because of the prices.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You shouldn’t be allowed to own residential property you don’t live on. There needs to be a way for people to move so after 3 months of owning a property that is not your primary residence taxes go through the roof and double every year.

      “What about renters?”
      Basement suites / duplexes exist. An apartment building will be better taken care of when the owner has to also live in the apartment building.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      it’s called a vacancy tax.

      landlords already get tax discounts for living in properties they rent out in most communities.

    • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      Easiest way is to ensure the unit isn’t vacant for more than a year, else they will get taxed extra. Also rent shouldn’t be x% higher than the mortgage.

      • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The first rule seems likely to work. The second guarantees no property will ever be renovated.

      • kalkulat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Good idea. There are plenty more conditions that could be added on to make becoming a landlord/gambler much less attractive. Like: you can’t even begin to buy another until you’ve finished your year and sold the place.

        • psx_crab@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yes, the government can actually do something about it if they want, and imo that’s the issue, because taxes from property sales is much more attractive to them.

          • Tanoh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Don’t forget brib…sorry, I mean lobbying from rich people and corporations owning a lot of properties.

      • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        Make the tax on properties you don’t personally inhabit a percentage of unrealized capital gains of all assets. Limit untaxed property size to an area the median person reporting for jury duty can circumnavigate on foot within one minute. Is the untaxed property size too small for your preference because the people of your county are too unhealthy? Maybe improve your local healthcare system.

        Basically, tie metrics coupled with the well-being of the median citizen with taxes on the wealthy. Eventually, the metrics will be framed or rigged by a corrupt charlatan or strongman (e.g. by exiling the sick and homeless), but to the extent that the laws are updated and enforced, people will be healthier.